17.09.07 Do reckless young drivers endanger lives in rural areas?

del.icio.us digg Technorati Furl reddit SPURL.NET
42 comments 228 votes

Young drivers, it seems, have become more reckless than ever before. This was the finding of a recently published report by the car firm, Autoglass, in association with RoadSafe. Of particular concern is the conduct of young drivers on rural roads.

The survey revealed a number of staggering facts about the consequences of young motorists’ driving habits.

Are younger drivers more hazardous on the road than older drivers?

  • Young drivers often take unprecedented risks. According to the study, 33% of drivers under the age of 25 admitted to having taken a bend at speed whilst driving down a rural road.
  • 66% of the drivers polled acknowledged having exceeded the acceptable speed limit.
  • Men, the study suggests, are more likely to be responsible for errors of judgement when driving than women.
  • 69% of male motorists under the age of 25 admitted to exceeding speed limits in rural areas compared to 50% of women.

Results of the Autoglass/Roadsafe survey revealed that poor driving practices on the part of younger drivers were to blame for a significant proportion of the 3,000 deaths on British roads each year. Indeed, for men, automobile accidents account for one in four deaths within the 15 - 24 age group. However, many young drivers do not appear to understand the magnitude of the problem caused by their risky behaviour.

Autoglass managing director Nigel Doggett says, “Less traffic on rural roads compared with urban roads and motorways often leads people to think that they are safer to drive on. But rural roads have their own very unique hazards, with high hedgerows, tractors and other slow-moving vehicles, hills, bends and blind corners affecting the view of the road ahead. Combine this with accelerated speeds and the time that a driver has to react is significantly shortened.”

Under these circumstances, hazardous driving practices such as overtaking at speed become particularly dangerous. In addition, rural roads tend to be far narrower than urban motorways. As a result, it is often difficult for motorists to judge the speed of cars travelling in the opposite direction.

There are a number of steps young drivers can take to ensure they remain safe when driving through rural areas.
  • Even if you believe that you are familiar with the routes you take, keep a watchful eye on the road ahead. Only overtake if you have a clear view of the rest of the road.
  • Beware of obstructions. These come in many forms – remember in rural areas, there’s always the possibility that you might need to stop to allow a cow to cross the road!
  • Even if you are travelling along a deserted country lane, there is no reason to exceed the limit. Indeed, the Autoglass/RoadSafe report acknowledged the existence of “an undoubted correlation between speeding and crashes” on rural roads.


Your Comments

Click here to add your comments

I don't think all young drivers are dangerous, some are quite conscientious. Safety is more a matter of experience and awareness than age. I think some of the most dangerous drivers are older ones who no longer feel they need to be as careful because they are "experienced".

Posted by Ivana H, 17th September 2007 4:23pm

Of course not all young drivers are dangerous! - both my son [25] and daughter [28] have been driving since 17 and neither have had so much as a scratch! I like to think that is because they were intelligent and imaginative enough to understand the risks, and bought up to have some modicum of consideration for others, and drive accordingly.
Driving is not innate, it is a skill to be learnt, by both experience, practice and understanding, much like everything else in life. Problem is that the consequences of not understanding that can be tragic in the case of driving. A car is a lethal weapon, and like other lethal weapons we should think very seriously about who should have them, and at what stage they should have them. We now have sophisticated simulation technology available which we could adopt as part of the driving test, and where we can test a drivers reactions to circumstances which could occur like, potential for road rage in frustrating driving conditions, simulated rural driving etc etc. - what and in particular when a driver could be let loose on our roads may then have a more objective basis than a ridiculously simple written test and a 30 min 'test' on the roads, when the candidate is focussed on doing everything right!

Posted by Peter Stokes, 18th September 2007 11:25am

I'm 19 and have never had a bump. I have mobility problems (will be having prosthetic legs very soon too) and am dependent on a car, so it does irritate me when reckless drivers push up the cost of insurance for the rest of us.

The most dangerous drivers are, unfortunately, those who are probably most dependent on personal transport - pensioners. To watch some of them drive is... pretty frightening, to say the least.

Posted by Mathew, 19th September 2007 11:38pm

I think we should not comment only by age.The experience,education,influences from others and etc.
Different backgrounds make people act differently.We shall not comment so absolutely.

Posted by Johnny Ding, 20th September 2007 9:49am

After many years of driving a car for business and pleasure I now feel frightened to be on the road. Speed seems to increase year after year. Although this is common across all ages it is obvious that the younger generation are the worst culprits. Even my own children think me offensive if I ask them to reduce their speed to a safe level. The problem is that it is becoming normal to drive at a high speed and abnormal to drive to speed limits and therefore the government should be looking at ways to reeducate our young drivers and probably being more forceful in punishing those that make our roads dangerous.

Posted by Susan Barnett, 27th September 2007 7:42pm

I think saying 'young drivers' are dangerous is to much of a generalization!

I am now 22 years old, Coving between 35 - 40,000 miles per year, and have been doing so since i was 18 years old.
I am not a reckless driver, i might be quick, but i am not reckless. I have only ever had one crash in all the miles i have covered, and that was when i was hit by an old lady (78) on a motorway, when she pulled into the side of me as she hadn't seen me! by the way, it was a clear sunny day at about lunch time!

I think we need to look at some other groups of the population before blanketing all 'young' drivers as dangerous and reckless!

Posted by Neil Cobb, 28th September 2007 9:19am

I live in Somerset which is very rural in parts. Dangerous driving on country roads in Somerset does occur frequently - during summer months when "Tourists" visit the area. Age does not come into it.

Posted by Tony H, 28th September 2007 9:59am

The Govnment would go a long way to reducing these figures if they adopted the same Test critera currently being introduced for Motorcyclists.
By limiting the size/power of the vehicle to the age/test the European Roadsafety Committee has determinded that 68% of these accidents would be stopped.
Introducing Re-Tests for those over 70 would help too

Posted by Jon, 28th September 2007 12:34pm

I think it is the attitude of all drivers along the country lanes to drive pretty quick as they have national speed limits on them. If they knew that they had to drive to the prediction of the lane and could be convicted of un-due care and attention and reckless driving then perhaps it might suggest a little better driving. I had a friend knocked off his bike last weekend by a lorry driver who wasnt looking where he was going, a school teacher friend in essex cycling through what we think is a quiet village was pushed off his bike by a driver and passenger and he broke his back, we lost a local to be olympic cyclist the previous year by a reckless driver and now we have a cyclist in ICU on life support and no-one has come forward. I am a horse owner and have the same problem when riding down our single track lane. the locals all have horses so drive carefully but there are the cut through drivers who dont realise that there is children on ponies and jockeys on racehorses.... One day it will be a very bad accident.....

Posted by Lea Marshall, 28th September 2007 3:04pm

I live in a rural area and the drivers round here are a nightmare, there are a few 'boy racers' that do drive recklessly, but most younger drivers are very good, they drive within their limits. The ones that are much worse are the older drivers, there are a few nice long straight roads with good visibility and 60mph speed limits, but the amount of times I have driven down roads like that and had old (70+) drivers pull out right it front of me. I am sorry about the generalisations but 'most' old people do not have anywhere they need to be and have plenty of spare time, so drive slowly (often 30mph in 60mph zones) and 'most' young people have busy lives, with schedules to keep and they do drive faster (within the legal limits) and this causes problems because the younger people have to spend a lot of time overtaking the older people round here and that's more likely to cause accidents. If everybody drove as close as safely possible to the speed limit then there would be a lot less accidents. Driving too fast or too slow can kill!

Posted by Dean Thorpe, 28th September 2007 3:36pm

I ticked the 'Yes' box because I really do think there are MORE young drivers who are a danger on the road than than there are Pensioners who are danger on the road.
I do however think it would be a good thing if Pensioners HAD to take a series of specialised driving lessons aimed at upgrading their current skills.
I did that anyway, via the 'Institute of Advanced Motorists', of which I am now a 72 year old member - and one does not become a member without passing their stringent criteria! Criteria that would help ALL drivers of any age...
(If I am breaking the 'Blog Policies' by referring the the IAM, then my apologies - and I suppose this will not then be posted)
One other thing. I think ALL drivers should have to be re-tested after some nationally agreed period of time.

Posted by Mr J A Cuckson, 28th September 2007 4:45pm

I have seen young people driving recklessly....however I have also seen middle aged and elderly people driving recklessly with little consideration for the safety of themselves and others, it is far to easy to generalise....it is also far to easy for the insurance companies to make an easy buck by charging the earth to insure young drivers. My son is taking driving lessons at the moment and the plan was to pick him up an old car and insure it for him so he starts earning no claims. However even though the car is only small and worth about £400 the cheapest insurance is around £3000.....is it any wonder people drive around without insurance? Has anyone got any advice on where to go to insure youngsters for a reasonable cost?

Posted by Mrs N Crowder, 29th September 2007 9:57am

A young lad I worked with passed his driving test less that two years ago he then took a pass plus driving test to bring his insurance down. Less than six months later he got a speeding ticket.He has now had three accidents, in the last one he wrapped his car around a tree killing the passanger because the passanger was not wearing a seat belt. The driver told me last week that he has another car( how can he afford the insurance).

Posted by Mr R Goodman, 2nd October 2007 7:05am

Rural roads are the only place the idiots can now drive at speed, all major roads with variable speed limits have speed cameras to raise money for the treasury.

Posted by David Purchase, 2nd October 2007 7:51am

I am 25 and have never had a bump, yes i admit im not perfect but i do think that its not so much us youngsters driving at speed that is the problem as the diverers! the people that wont commit at a junction and darent drive over 25mph that create frustration hence people taking risks. i honestly think there should be some sort of re-test including a medical when you reach 65.

Posted by Jp, 6th October 2007 12:11am

"69% of male motorists under the age of 25 admitted to exceeding speed limits in rural areas compared to 50% of women. "

Just means 50% of women are liers and only 31% of men are. Inconclusive evidence.

Posted by N F, 10th October 2007 9:57pm

i think its a mad world out on the roads ,it doesnt matter how old the driver is..i am on the road all day and think driving standards have got worse and its not just speed related .
its just purely get out of my way i am coming through attitude..

we all need to be resonsible on the road there are to many deaths and there rising.

Posted by Rob, 14th October 2007 3:55pm

There is no doubt that young blood encourages drivers to drive at high speed in a lot of cases. You can see this clearly on the roads after 8pm when the 'young' get out on the road in droves. I would not however, be quick to call them all dangerous. Lots of young people are excellent, sensible drivers and completely responsible for their vehicles. My daughter is about to train to drive a Fire Engine and she is only 24! It is the individual that makes the driver good, not the age, although there is clearly more irresponsible drivers amongst the young age group rather than others - this is substantiated by the statistics on accidents.

Lots of accidents on motorways are caused by Lorries speeding - they are not all young drivers - they are supposed to be responsible adults! I say, we should get as many of these off of our roads as possible and put the fright on the railways and canals. One supermarket has just recently taken the first move by getting their wine on to a barge! great stuff!

Posted by Christal, 31st October 2007 12:12pm

I am a horse rider and ride regularly along rural roads especially in winter when the few bridleways we do have are to muddy to use. I have found equally young and old drivers to be ignorant of the Highway Code when it comes to horses on the roads- but speeding is a different issue and it's usually younger drivers who try to overtake inappropriately or drive past at an unnerving speed as they feel 'it's their right'.

We have 2 Z bends on our roads and most cars use it as a rat run to get to the M4 junction 17 (which is quite a lot!!) and cars have skidded to avoid us, overtaken and almost hit oncoming traffic and unfortunately most have been young drivers.

As a driver myself also I take care along rural roads as not only could there be a horse rider around the next bend, there could be walkers/ramblers or even kids on bikes (who also don't know their Highway Code or Proficiency Test!!) and have almost hit children on the road cycling in a haphazard manner. I drive a Freelander so it's not exactly small or hard to see!!

Quote from N F-

" "69% of male motorists under the age of 25 admitted to exceeding speed limits in rural areas compared to 50% of women. "

Just means 50% of women are liers and only 31% of men are. Inconclusive evidence."

That 50% of women who don't speed are probably the ones that spend most of their time looking after the kids, doing the housework, holding down a job, etc., etc. They don't have time to drive around in rural areas LOL!! And the 69% is probably exaggeration cos that's what bloke do best!!







Posted by Andrea (and Mark), 1st November 2007 10:08am

96% of rural road injury crashes do not involve speeding.

Posted by Gwyn Jones, 6th November 2007 7:01pm

96% of rural road injury crashes do not involve speeding.
SafeSpeedPR/message/424

Posted by G J, 6th November 2007 7:08pm

This comment has been removed as it was found to be in breach of our Blog Policies.

This comment has been removed as it was found to be in breach of our Blog Policies.

Do horses pay road tax? ...if not and seeing as they're already equiped with off road traction devices ..why are they allowed on the road at all?

Another example of antique legislation still in existence, it begs the question just how many accidents have been caused by horses on the road.

Posted by Fred Flintstone, 10th November 2007 10:42pm

i think that all young drivers are not dangerous on the roads. I think that this is the significant issue to expose all young drivers, yes, there is that percentage that some young drivers are dangerous on the roads but older people could be worse, as some have the lack of sight and reflexes in order to stop in an emergency and so on.

Posted by Katelin Bramble, 13th November 2007 2:54pm

I think we need to differentiate between speeding and dangerous, a car is still a very dangerous object in the hands of someone who's either inexperienced, tired, drunk, a bit under the weather even when travelling at the prescribed speed limit.

Lets not fall into the same trap the goverment has by commiting to these ridiculous speed cameras, which do absolutly nothing outside of a very very small patch of road, the person driving may be doing 4 mph over the speed limit, but if not interfered with could quite possibly spend his whole life not having an accident.
The concept of speed cameras only works if people driving a vehicle, either consistantly speed, or consistantly stay within the limit. Saddly whats happening in real life is, those that are not really a danger and wander a couple of miles an hour above are being caught and fined and those that drive fast and flaut the law have learnt to figure out where the cameras are, slow down for that part of the road only and then speed right back up again, hence inspite of the camera partnerships propaganda, deaths and accidents are not on the decrease, all its done is allow another private enterprise to rake in the cash in the name of road safety while not acheiveing anything.

Another factor on the increase is number plate cloning, so beware all you people who still think, inspite of all the evidence to the contrary, that these cameras are a good idea, because it's quite likely an intention to prosecute notice could end up on your doormat, where someone has been flashed displaying your number and because he wasn't actually caught by an officer who could investigate properly, you end up with a 100 pound fine and the new 6 points on your licence and having been there, there's no way out, you're just called a liar.

If these partnerships were costing the government money instead of making it money, this would have been declared an abject failiure already.

Remove the speed cameras and put actual police back on the road before any more people are killed and innocent people are convicted of crimes they haven't actually commited by the stupid and naive ideas of this idiotic nanny state government.

Posted by Colin Bishop, 13th November 2007 3:18pm

i do not think the driving test should be raised, it is just stupid that these older people are deciding over this and they were once in the positition of a young person one day to. Also horses should not be on the road!!

Horses just make a mess of the roads by shitting everywhere. where i live the horses make a total mess which could lead to dangers on the road for driving condtions.

older people should just go look at themselves, most of them are terrible drivers that just like to blame their mistakes on the younger people

Posted by Whats A Juggalo, 15th November 2007 11:07am

i wholey disagree with this.

i am 18 and live in a rural area, but commute to inner city areas on a daily basis.
the worst drivers by far are those in cities.
but, i do feel that there are many older drivers that think they are 'invincible' because they have experience.
in the recent fogs i have driven past countless 40 something executive types driving in thick fog with no lights on.
and young drivers get called bad drivers because a small minority drive like coc*s and lack the most basic of driving principles, anticipation.

i have been in cars of all manner of style and performance with driver of all ages and i stand by it to this day, my grandad in his jag xk8 is the scariest and most dangerous of the lot.

Posted by Ross Hayes, 16th November 2007 10:25pm

To comment on this question I will relate to my own driving. I am a 47 year old male who currently average about 40,000 miles a year and used to average over 70,000. Have I had accidents? Yes. Why did I have accidents? When I was younger (Teens to twenties) it was always due to speed and lack of experience coupled with fairly powerful cars. Link this to a male 'testosterone burning driving ego' and, well, the rsults were predictable. 5 accidents by the time I was 24, 2 of which were very serious. As I have grown older I have become more careful, anticipating better, more considerate of other drivers, and calmer! Do I still drive fast? Yes, but not the scary seat of your pants type driving I used to do. This highlights some of the very sensible comments some have made on this forum: 1. Limit new drivers to a maximum engine limit of, say, 1.0L until they are 21. 2. If they have more than 2 accidents in one year, they should have to retake their driving test until they're 21. 3. Infringements of traffic laws should incur double points on their licence until they're 21. A verified report from the public of reckless or antisocial driving should result in a 1 month ban (servable by the police on the spot) until the age of 21. Once reacing the age of 21, the above could still apply but in a slightly diluted form until they're 25, i.e. 1.5L engine limit etc. This should be done in conjunction with the police and insurance companies, with a guarantee from the latter that insurance policy costs would drop

Posted by Richard Shelton, 1st December 2007 3:47pm

My apologies to all careful female drivers, but I would like to dispute the claims that all women drivers are more careful than men in rural areas.
I live in Dorset and drive a performance car...I often look in my mirror and see a female in a car trying to touch my back bumper while gassing on a mobile phone and smoking, and the surprising thing is they don't seem to be aware of what they are doing!!
I also see that a good amount of speeders passing thru our 30mph village are female school teachers on their way to and from school.

I was driving thru a village recently and slowed for the 30 mph limit..the woman in the 4wd behind me then caught up and sat on my back bumber until we were abreast of the school...she then proceeded to overtake at about 50 and to my horror ,her car was full of toddlers, all climbing around unfettered.

Posted by Deepdiesel, 11th December 2007 12:52pm

There seem to be regional variations in maniac behaviour. For a really scary experience, try rural Surrey! Roads scoured by madmen of all ages in Mercs and BMWs, who (naturally) own the road.

Posted by I C, 11th December 2007 10:08pm

I agree with alot of the comments regarding speeding they all make good points in my arex we have alterd part of a speed limit from 40 to 50 as we have a bottle neck from asda round about and traffick cannot get away so cars do silly over taking works well keeps speeding down. I Think all new drivers should take lessons on motorway driving, drivers over 70 should be
sight retested every 3yrs gluecome and other medical conditions.
I have epilepsy and have to reply for my licernce every 3yrs so i try to think about speed be aware of other drivers ect and i am 67yrs old and driving was my living all my life so it makes you think

Posted by Douglas Smith, 16th December 2007 8:48pm

In response to comment number 12, Im only 18 and a girl and have a small car. I went to Ensleigh for my insurance and i got a quote of £12000, but alot of my boy mates have gone to this insurance company and theirs is only a few hundred pound more than mine. Hope this helps :)

Posted by Lyndsey Perry, 18th December 2007 11:10am

There are cr*p drivers of all ages out there. The young ones may be bad due to lack of experience, the middle aged may tend to be overconfident due to having that experience and those that are of pensionable age are often to be seen driving as if there was still the same number of cars/hazards on the roads as there were when they first started driving. Everyone (bar tractors) speeds to some extent but if the road allows you to safely drive at a reasonable speed and the other cars on the road are doing that speed, surely it is safer to travel at a similar speed to everyone else?

And why the hell does everyone brake going downhill? You're travelling along at 40, in a 40 zone, it's a straight road but going downhill, WHY BRAKE DOWN TO 20? THERE IS NO NEED.

Posted by Steph, 20th December 2007 4:11pm

Especially when the same people who brake going downhill are perfectly happy doing 90+ on the motorway...

Posted by Steph, 20th December 2007 4:13pm

We have many vehicles on our roads that can go over the speed limit with out been licencened cycle lanes ect i often look at back comments i read one from Mr Col Bishop 13 nov 07 mobility scooters well worth insueningfully comp bumps your scooter and you speed 4mph 8mph some more a hand
speed gun was tested the car parked h/b on showing 8 mph so 34 mph will they deduct 8mph (26)bike lane on path past your gate no lights on how do you asses speed some must be 20mph horse riders say your fault
causeing horse to rear up not useing the country code (YOU MEAN THERE
COUNTRY CODE) Ho we farmed rather big farm so we know what we mean
like traveling from field w to field on the grass with out going on rd red derv helps farmers alot WELL COL BISHOP 13 NOV 07 GAVE ME SOME READING
PLEASE SORRY FOR MY SPELLING SOME WILL THINK IT RUBBISH GETTING
ON IN YRS NOW TRY MY POINT HAPPY NEW YEAR

Posted by Douglas Smith, 26th December 2007 3:10pm

Most insurance related accidents occur in the 17 to 21 and 70 plus age ranges. In most other age groups there is no significant difference in the actual number of reported accidents but men have many more speed influenced (i.e. occur at higher speed with greater damage) and 3rd party involved accidents and women have many more stationary accidents (i.e. run into bollards, garages, etc). The much quoted survey showing only 6 or 4 % of accidents involve speed is statistically flawed and even the people who carried out the study say it is unreliable. The biggest safety factors are anticipation and awareness the first is missing in the younger age range and the second in the latter. Finally some of these messages are so poor as to be unintelligible and I think that the authors should not be allowed to handle a keyboard let alone a car!

Posted by Alan Pettitt, 2nd January 2008 3:26pm

I'm 17 and passed about 2 months ago,
I will admit that I drive fast, where the conditions allow,
However I will not speed where is a risk posed to someone else,
Never with family or friends in the car, never near housing or other areas with people about.
I've only got a small 1L car and that is certainly a help in keeping the speed down,
But it does encourage you to drive hard. My instructor had a large turbo diesel.
And the more relaxed pace removes the urge to drive fast.
I admit many of my peers are shockingly bad drivers, 9 out of 10 cars in the collage car park had had a bump or a scrape,
However I do not believe that i drive as badly as any of them, and I dislike the fact that I am penalised for someone else's bad driving.

Posted by Rob E, 7th January 2008 10:04am

Forgive me Rob but you're 17. You passed your test 2 months ago. How can you feel you have the experience or maturity to pass judgement in the manner you have? You may well believe you are the best driver around and I will admit there is every chance that you are perfectly safe in a car, however, 2 months of driving does not qualify ANYONE to make such a claim. Your attitude alone marks you out as being one of the arrogant young men/boys whose driving you feel you are being penalised for.

Posted by Anon, 8th January 2008 12:48pm

I do not believe I am the best driver around, far from,
However, it's not the majority of young people that are the problem,
My attitude is like it is because of years of older so called more experienced drivers. Who feel that they can push newer drivers about , leading to a need to prove yourself.
Most of the people in my collage who have had accidents have them driving with a full car of friends and music on, things I avoid,
There are at least two people in my collage who have written a car off within 2 weeks of passing.
Being 17 makes it plain I'm new as I look young in the car. And I have had many more problems both when learning and since passed with older drivers who feel they rule the road.
As for a lack of experience. I admit it's not years. But it is varied. Since passing there has been a lot of snow, ice, rain and other difficult road conditions. As well as several trips into the EU. I look forward to expanding this.
I never would and certainly do not claim to be the world's best driver. That is an impossible title, and I believe a misconception on your part, I'm sorry if that how it came across.
As long as we have young people we will have high speed. I hope that many more young drivers are sensible enough to limit this and to look towards track days and other settings where it is appropriate to burn this urge to go faster.

I'd prefer it if I was not braded as a "boy" or my attitude was assumed to fit with the "boy racer" stereotype. Or my maturity questioned.

I hope this clears up why I feel the way I do. And I hope you would be kind enough to share with us why you feel the way you do. As understanding why you feel like this is more likely to get a positive response from me and may allow me to look at things from another perspective.

Posted by Rob E, 8th January 2008 2:48pm

Age is not the issue, safer driving is. I think more people drive carefully and responsibly than they used to.

A good driver is one that you do not notice. I remember the days when the code was "care, courtesy and consideration" a lot of drivers believe that "saving" 5 minutes is more important than showing consideration to an older driver because he/she drives more slowly to account for slower reactions.

Please let us try and be more tolerant of others, in so doing we will make the roads even safer.

Posted by Nicholas Frost, 27th January 2008 11:28pm

I have just passed my test and find it impossible to afford insurance...i totaly blaime older farts such as the person who left comment 39 as they must feel that they own the roads. I would also like to say that...catch yourself older people where once "young lads" aswell which older people like to stereotype..to be honest i think a lot of the older people are a lot more dangerous in a car as they think they own the road..also i have been driving for a very short amount of time and descovered the road rage out of them a total disgrace!!! they ave no mannours for learner drivers watso ever. I would just like to say...before you start to "slabbour" about other people go look at the mirror and take a deep look at yourself

Posted by Whats A Juggalo, 14th February 2008 9:51pm

young drivers are killers!!!

Posted by Susan Mc Areavey, 26th October 2008 1:20pm

Not all young drivers are bad at driving. I've noticed that the older generation aren't able to indicate on roundabouts, undertake people on the m4, and pull out on you on a busy roundabout! It's silly that the young drivers are being blamed for dangerous driving when they can't be bothered to do the simple things right!

Posted by Emma-kate, 30th November 2009 2:45pm
Please ensure your comments comply with our Blog Policies or your comment may be removed.
Full Name: *
Email Address: *
Comments: *
Enter the code you see to the left into the text box below.
 

Your email address is required so we can verify that the comment is genuine. It will not be posted anywhere on the site, will be stored confidentially by us and never given out to any third party.

Please note that any viewpoints published here as comments are user's views and not the views of PetrolPrices.com (Fubra Ltd)

« Go Back to Main Blog