04.12.07 Further calls by motoring industry for a wider M6
Members of the Freight Transport Association's West Midlands Freight Council have demanded that the UK government take action to widen one of the country’s principal highways, the M6. Of particular concern to the organisation is the width of the highway between junctions 11a in Staffordshire and 19 in Cheshire. This stretch of the motorway currently experiences very high levels of congestion. It is feared that government inaction will result in further gridlock, leaving motorists stranded on a regular basis.
It was initially suggested by the Freight Transport Association that the M6 be widened so that it consisted of 4 lanes running in each direction. This idea were proposed 7 years ago. However, little has since been done to achieve this goal. The government, it appears, does not share the FTA’s concerns. Whilst it has sanctioned study after study on the matter, it has failed to take any concrete action.
Widening the M6 motorway will have a beneficial impact on the economies of the West Midlands and the North West. In addition, the Freight Transport Association has argued that better transport links are an essential part of improving the national economy. According to the FTA, “UK plc is currently being restrained by the inadequate and antiquated transport system…We can no longer afford not to widen the M6.”
Those against the widening of the M6 motorway are particularly concerned about the impact that such a move would have on the environment. The Campaign to Protect Rural England (CPRE) has argued that widening the highway would require large sections of woodland to be cut down. Furthermore, pollution may well increase as the number of cars passing through the region increases following the completion of the motorway.
Expanding the M6 is likely to increase car dependence. As the transport system improves, more individuals will leave their homes in urban areas, choosing instead to take up residence away from the city. As such, they will need to commute (often by car) to their offices each day.
The FTA has argued that the widening of the M6 will allow for a cleaner, greener Britain. “Smooth running journeys,” the Freight Transport Association has argued, “are a far lesser pollutant than the slow, stop-start journeys currently experienced on the M6.” Opponents of the M6 widening have also criticised the project on the grounds of its cost, which is an estimated £3 billion. It has been suggested that the high levels of investment required could be put to better use elsewhere. With the quality of public transport poor, it is apparent that investment in this sector is desperately needed.
Do you feel that widening the M6 would be beneficial? Share your thoughts here.








Your Comments
Click here to add your comments
"The FTA has argued that the widening of the M6 will allow for a cleaner, greener Britain."
What a load of rubbish. Just keep widening those roads, more lorries, bigger lorries.
At least it will be something worthwhile to spend all of that extra revenue gleened from the Motorist
When at my Daughters home I see Freight Trains with ONE Locomotive pulling MODERN freight trucks each one containing one or two lorry loads or more of freight I wonder why the Government does not encourage ALL LONG Distance freight on to rail.Switzerland is now FORCING through Freight traffic onto rail. It in conjunction with Italy is building tunnels capable of taking lorries through Switzerland on freight trains as per the Channel Tunnel with the lorry driver ignoring this option being heavily fined! Their Government has common sense!