16.02.07 Why did you sign the travel tax petition?

del.icio.us digg Technorati Furl reddit SPURL.NET
3982 comments 25316 votes

Unless you have had your head buried in the sand for the last 6 weeks, you will have seen and quite probably signed the travel tax petition.

Did you sign the travel tax petition?
Over 1.5 million UK citizens have now signed the petition which will be closed to new signatures on 20th February.

The petition is a plea to "scrap the planned vehicle tracking and road pricing policy" which the Department for Transport is proposing as a solution to congestion on UK roads. Every vehicle would be tracked via satellite and motorists would pay tax depending on how far they travel, at what time and on which roads. This new travel tax would probably take the place of vehicle tax discs and fuel tax (so petrol and diesel would be much cheaper).

We are delighted that the British public is getting so involved in this issue. However, for this petition to be a success, it should not just dismiss this travel tax idea outright. Instead, it should spark a debate into the pros and cons of this tax. If the proposed system is a bad idea then how do you think motoring should be taxed in the future? Let's all have our say and see if we can come up with a better solution. You tell us:
Do you support the concept of paying tax according to when and where you drive?

  • Could this new road tax system work?
  • Do you have a better idea of how to tax motoring?

Your Comments

Click here to add your comments

This comment has been removed as it was found to be in breach of our Blog Policies.

I have read with much interest all the comments on road charging and disabled peoples woes and the peolpe who live where there are no busses and the poor people etc etc. I travel 40,000miles per year and if the system is introduced shall have to pay to travel, I am somewhat dismayed at the griping that is going on though. For Example Disabled drivers, you get your car paid for by others (motability) you do not pay roadtax (subsidised by the rest of us) you can flount parking laws with your blue badge (watch out Heather Mills) nor do you have to pay and display! you have had it cheap for many years now and it is only right that everybody who wants to drive should pay there way. As for people who live in rural areas, Tough! you too will have to pay the same as the rest of us too.
Instead of a pay as you go charge why not put all tax on fuel. With an ID card that has a smart chip on it. The information on the chip would be Driving licence Number, insurance policy and vehicle details, this card would then be used to operate the fuel pump. If all the information is not correct no fuel will be dispensed (this would stop uninsured/unlicenced and maybe even the Travelling people from getting fuel) therefore reducing the number of cars on the road.
Whatever the muppets at number 10 decide we will have to go along with it but sure as eggs are eggs it will start off cheap then rocket to silly money (look at M6 toll prices £1 when it opened now £4?) all the money raised will not help the environment though.
Does anybody else feel we are turning into a communist state?

Posted by Jamie Hyde, 28th February 2007 3:23pm

I do not agree with a travel tax. I am a pensioner and I live in the country. My nearest shop is over 3 miles away and the nearest station over 6 (with a very poor train service). Public transport in the area is very poor. I would have to move house if this tax goes ahead. I do not believe that road tax and fuel duty would be abolished or even considerably lowered in order to compensate. Governments are wonderful at making promises and subsequently finding excuses to renege on them.

Posted by Helen Penny, 28th February 2007 3:23pm

Like many comments being being made a disibility exsists in the househould and wheelchair is involved, so public transprt is definetly out.
My biggest objection to any further burdens on motorists is that what ever the seem to want to do loopholes will always exsist. Therefore those who currently have no "ROAD TAX or INSURANCE" will find the loopholes and again avoid any payment, where the law abiding will have to pay extra to cover them.
I think it is about time any government stopped using the soft options of the motorist to gain revenue and reduce road tax and abolish all taxes (as there appear to be several per litre) and combine them into one called fuel tax which should be easier for companies to implement, and then those who use the roads will be paying there fairer share whether they avoid road tax or not.

Posted by Charles Haughey, 28th February 2007 3:23pm

Am I the only one that thinks we are being ripped off, when you hear on the radio, and t.v, that record profits are being made by the petrol companies, but the price goes up quicker than it comes down?.More tax for Gordon then, while transport companies like my self, struggle to make a living.

Posted by Steve Smith, 28th February 2007 3:24pm

I do not think additional taxes should be imposed on the motorist, who pays more tax than most, as the vehicle has VAT added at the time of purchase, an annual tax is paid before the vehicle can be driven on the public highway and fuel and servicing is also taxable.
I am disabled and without my car, I would find it virtually impossible to go to the shops if I had to travel by public transport.
Stop penalising the motorist who appears to be an easy victim to the exchequer.

Posted by Christine Lloyd, 28th February 2007 3:25pm

I think they should introduce tax to make people think about other alternatives. But if people need their cars, for example if there is no local transport, or if someone is disabled this should be taken into consideration as well. I also think the government should actually look at alternatives to petrol cars such as biodesiel, not keep promoting unrenewable sources. The tax should maybe be put into improving public transports, or rewarding people who use such methods. I have started cycling to work past all the traffic jams and it gets me fit and saves me money plus it is very satisfying going past all the traffic jams.

Posted by Rowena Hicks, 28th February 2007 3:25pm

It's all very well people saying that motorists must get out of their cars and use public transport - the problem is that public transport just is not adequate and, until it is, I don't think anyone has the right to demand that motorists give up their cars (where feasilble). Some journeys cannot be made by public transport and the alternative needs to be acceptable, for example it is no good saying that a 30 minute car journey can be replaced by a 2.5 hour bus and train journey. I fo one do not intend to add 4 hours to my working day. I'm sure if I worked in a metropolitan area like London I would be only too happy to use public transport as it is a viable (most times better) alternative.
The tax currently collected from the motoring public does not go on transport so in my view this would be just another stealth tax.

Posted by Lyall Cory, 28th February 2007 3:25pm

Yes, I did sign. My wife would liked to sign too, but as we share and email address she could not, so what would the total have been if everyone who wanted to sign could have done so?


There are too many unanswered questions. If road pricing replaces Road Fund License Fees and Fuel Tax, I may favour it. I am retired and now do a low mileage, at non-rush hour times. However, if the new tax does not make any differential between low emmission, low fuel hungry cars, the effect on the environment could be worse, as gas guzzlers will make a big comeback. With fuel costs down I would be tempted back to a 2.5l V6 rather than my present 1.6 four.

Also, my experience of taxation leaves me sceptical. It might start looking low but will soon grow if the net revenue take falls.

Existing motoring taxes are not spent on motoring related matters, be that police patrols, road maintenance, cameras, new roads, traffic flow improvements etc. They go into the general pot and probably went some distance towards the costs of the ill concieved, disasterous Iraq war.

Any initial reduction in traffic flows will soon be lost as we will get used to the cost and revert to travelling as we wish. So were is the benefit?

Posted by Gordon Brown (no Not Him!), 28th February 2007 3:27pm

Have you ever been on public transport AHHH !!!
They drive without consideration for the eldery trying to sit down after alighting the bus many have ended up on the floor
same when disembarking if you not stood up there off down the road.
People wonder why cars are need.
and where would the TAX come from ?

Posted by Ian Mewse, 28th February 2007 3:27pm

I did sign the petition against travel tax mainly because nobody can give a clear indication of how this would work.

It is true that you pay tolls in Spain and France to use their main motorways, with all other roads being toll free. My understanding from the Travel Tax is that we would be taxed to use all roads.

I have read the various arguments about cars being over used, and in some instances these are. Mothers and Fathers driving children to school, (the primary school is 10mins from my house and my next door neightbour uses her car to take her child to school then returns home) what's wrong with walking, it hasnt done my brother or I any harm and in fact made use very aware of real fears and not pretend fears.

I for one do own a car and I use public transport - park and ride. The public transport in the UK is the most expensive in Europe, my train is never on time and in fact this morning was 20mins late, I cannot get a seat as the train is packed and to say that there is not enough funding is just ridiculous. The car park where I park my car is currently free but the rail ways want to now start charging and are telling us this will go to towards public transport - I dont believe this will happen, we have heard it to often. The public transport system does not always reach far out areas and if it does is very limited so these people have no choice but to use their cars. Having a car is not always about being rich, it can be an essential part of people's lives. I use my car mainly in the evenings to access my local sports and running club that I am a member of and at weekends to visit my elderly parents - unfortunately where they stay is not easily accessible by public transport.

If they want to tax us for using the car, then take the tax out of petrol and road tax but they certainly cant have it all ways. Did you also know that Councils etc are greatly responsible for causing congestion by making roads one way, blocking roads off and not setting traffic lights to run in conjuction with each other!! And have you ever noticed how there is very little congestion when the schools are on holiday - does this not say something itself! Before anything is done to change this tax - there is a great deal to look into.

Posted by Gaenor Moore, 28th February 2007 3:28pm

i think they need to get public transport working properly if they want us to use it, why is it the motorist is always getting sme sort of tax added to them are we not paying over the odds now? and if it is to do with global warming then if britain went green does that mean we save the planet for all the ignorant POEPLE that just carried on regardless.

Posted by Mike Dowling, 28th February 2007 3:29pm

I don't agree with the seemingly Draconian methods of taxing, which have been discussed, but what alternatives do we have? Make all public transport free to use for every member of society, paid for by this proposed tax on personal vehicles.

Posted by Sean Wright, 28th February 2007 3:29pm

I didn't realise just how many ignorant people there are out there! I am poor (I earn well below the National average) yet I need a car. I work as a Visiting Warden visiting people in their own homes; disabled and elderly people who need help and support. I cant do my job without a car!
Salman said that cycling is too dangerous on our public roads..i totally agree. Last time I took my bike out, i was terrified!
Una B said "Well... a car is a luxury item, so for a start that should keep the poor out of this equation.. if you are poor you shouldn't waste money on running a car... "WHO THE HELL DO YOU THINK YOU ARE? Most of us drivers are poor! I earnt the money to save up for my car and I earn the money that keeps my car on the road! We just want to live our lives, earn a living and get from A-B! Whatever our level of income is!
Public transport is a joke, as many of you have pointed out! I could never rely on public transport. I decided to visit someone in London one day(it's an hours drive from here). It took me 3 hours to get there and 3 hours back! I geuss i am like most people, i dont have time to waste!
Ian Grice said "What good will it do to charge people to go to work? ( sorry boss cant come in for 9am the charge is to high, I will be in at 7am and you will have to pay me overtime so I can afford to go home). Hear hear! I totally agree with you Ian.
John Irving you said it doesnt worry you about the road tax charge. you said it terrifies you! Me too! I work and I cant afford all these taxes!
Peter Conely said there would be a lot less cars on the road if credit were harder to come by. But there would be less people working if that were the case!
WHAT YOU ALL SEEM TO HAVE MISSED IS THIS: What happended to freedom of choice?
I work hard for my money (even though my income is low), so why shouldnt I be able to own a car and drive it!
For all those arrogant and ignorant people out there....take your rose tinted glasses off and take a good long hard look around you!





Posted by Julie Parnell, 28th February 2007 3:29pm

This is just another way for the Government to get more money out of motorists - we already pay tax on our cars and pay higher petrol prices why should we have to pay even more. I commute from a town to work in the city to earn extra money to have a better life and to enhance my career prospects - my round trip is approx. 70 miles, this takes approximately 1 hour each way. Yes this was my choice but why should I be punished for taking the initiative, for being paid what I am worth and for wanting a better life.

If I were to use public transport this would take me approx. 2 & 1/2 hours each way, it would include walking alone very early in the morning and late at night putting my life at risk. Even if I was to drive to the train station I would then have to leave my new car in an unsecure car park until late at night.

I am sick and tired of being punished for being a British Citizen, I have worked ever since I left school, never claimed benefits, never had bad credit, always paid my tax and NI - and what do I get in return, NOTHING!!! I am trying to save for my first house which is going to be impossible enough without the Government taking even more money from me. I travel the distance I do to have a better life not to give extra money to the Government especially when all they'll probably do with it is send it overseas instead of looking after their own country!!!

Posted by Lyndsay Ross, 28th February 2007 3:29pm

I think this new idea is just another stealth tax, and would frankly like to know when it will all stop!. Lets just ponder the thought that we all stop using our cars, the billions that government would loose on fuel duty would cripple their cash flow!!!! so how would they replace that money.........train tax? bus station tax? just like our airports!.

The other day I went to Sheffield from Southampton, my single ticket cost was £117.00 for a wednesday. How on earth can this be acceptable as a cheap public transport?. Fares like this are not heard of on the continent. I run a diesel Audi and average 38mpg, that trip would have cost me less than £30.00 and could have taken 4 other passengers. And yes 38mpg for a 4 WHEEL DRIVE Audi, that dreaded word 4WD. How can people condemn 4wd drivers, their 1600cc petrol hatches would return that sort of economy!!.

Even our local bus service is hugely expensive, Friday night the wife and I caught a taxi from our house to Southampton centre for a charge of £5.50, we though we'd catch a bus back... well what an experience, I would not do it again, for starters the cost was £4.80 for the two of us and that didnt even get us to the door, we had a 3/4 mile walk from the drop off. Although that was not the main worry, it was that fact we had an aggressive drunk on board, the bus was dirty and sticky! and thats not a way to finsih a romantic night out with your wife! taxi it will be next time.

I ask what is this country coming to!

Another point is if they say that congestion is going up each year, at what percentage? perhaps we should not grant driving licences to immigrants entering the country and make them use public transport! If we are clearly stating our road infrastructure cannot manage what we have, why make it worse!!.

I run a small business carrying out commercial glazing, and probably average over our fleet 250'000 miles per annum, any additional costs will be added to my selling costs..........again this will only affect the public.

Last week we went to Abu Dhabi, we had a hire car which was a gas guzzling Volvo XC90 4WD, to fill it up cost less than £20.00, the same thing here would be nearly £70.00. does the government not think they are charging enough?

So I leave you noting that this upsets me, I can see soon that I along with my family will be joining others and leaving this country!

Posted by Julian Paul, 28th February 2007 3:30pm

The main reason why I object to the road-pricing scheme is that it does not address the problem. Taxation (for that is what it amounts to) SOUNDS good to some people but will surely serve only to impoverish and frustrate. It is possible that I, and others, would look at it more sympathetically if the government was less authoritarian, less taxing, less populist and less manipulative of public opinion. But they unfailingly reach for the easy option. There are other options - detailed traffic management would be one, decent public transport another - but the first is too detailed and boring for politicians to deal with, the second apparently beyond their expertise. Road-pricing will merely make people more miserable without solving the problem.

Posted by Christopher Knowles, 28th February 2007 3:30pm

I think that the 'Tax as you go" system could work, but only if Road Tax and Fuel Tax were discarded. It is only logical that those who use the roads the most should pay the most. Also a proportion, say 70 per cent, should be chanelled directly into road and public transport improvements. Using the 'tracker' system to calculate and invoice the motorist would also give the opportunity to offload most of the civil servants at DVLA, thus reducing costs even more.
However, I suspect that this money-grabbing government is only interested in using the revenue for the treasury. It would also be loathe to get rid of jobs at the DVLA, so I suspect that Road Tax per se would not disappear.

Posted by Christopher Morris, 28th February 2007 3:30pm

As apensioner driving less than 6000 miles per annum it may be in my interests to opt for a pay as you go road tax system.
The alternative is to offer senior citizens the choice i.e. no road charges/or reduced road tax if agreed not to drive within peak hours.
Whilst the mileage is small it is important for once agaain it is not possible to replace the majority of miles by using public transport.

Posted by Albert William Stupples, 28th February 2007 3:31pm

Here's a letter I sent to the PM following receipt of his e-mail:

Dear Prime Minister

When will government begin to understand one of the major reasons for traffic congestion in our towns and cities.

The 3 major reasons for people using motor cars are:-

Lack of investment in infrastructure - building and adaption of our exising road systems to cope with future traffic growth
Lack of investment in public transport to provide frequent; punctual; clean; sufficient; reasonably priced public transportation covering routes that the traveling public really need
Sufficient public parking at low prices on the outskirts of our cities and towns with low priced; frequent links to places of work; shopping and leisure locations

Government needs to understand that the majority of journeys that people make are because the above solutions do not exist.

Government appears to have totally given up any responsibility to provide any of the real solutions.

One could ask how much revenue does the government derive from:-

Road Fund Tax
Fuel Duty
VAT on fuel
VAT on the sale of motor vehicles
VAT on vehicle servicing; spare parts etc
Insurance Tax on insurance for motor vehicles ?????

Were all of this revenue to be transparently spent of the solutions to congestion, surely congestion would reduce and there would be absolutely no need to introduce a further form of taxation under the guise of "reducing road congestion"

Those people who have reason to travel into Central London have been for some time now been subject to a so called "Congestion Charge", and the Mayor has recently been permitted to extend the charging zone to cover what is a mainly residential area. The costs to install the system have been extremely high and it has collected a vast amount of money - BUT what has been the contribution to reducing congestion - VERY LITTLE I would suggest. It would appear that traffic has reduced by only 8%, and there is very little evidence of the revenue benefiting either residents or visitors of London, in fact we now have the most expensive; most crowded; most dirty and poor service in Western Europe, yet this is supposed to be one of the major capital cities in the world.

Why do you think so many people make long distance journeys by car? - might it have something to do with the cost of train travel, and the great likelihood that one has a high possibility of making a 3 hour journey without a seat, having paid £60 to travel

Why are so many people returning to commuting by car, might it have something to do with overcrowded trains, that are frequently are cancelled or most certainly arrive late, and for the privilege are having to pay fares vastly in excess of the cost of traveling by car, where the costs are increasing by at least twice the official rate of inflation?

Mr Prime Minister - is it not about time that you became honest with the traveling public and admit that you and your ministers do not have a clue as to what do about transportation; that you have no real plans to solve the problem and that the idea of "road pricing" is just a sham and a further method of extracting further taxation from the (already overtaxed) traveling public - taxation for which we are getting nothing in return.

I seem to remember some 10 years ago a new Prime Minister asking his ministers to "think the unthinkable", where they did do this you fired them and replaced them with people incapable of "joined up thinking". Is it not about time after 10 years to genuinely attempt to solve problems, rather than just extract more unfair taxation.

Your "honest" comments would be appreciated, for as you have so often claimed you are "an honest sort of guy"

Bernard Burne-Cronshaw

Posted by Bernard Burne-cronshaw, 28th February 2007 3:31pm

I'm insulted! Matthew (No9) cooments about people not needing these 'big' vehicles. We live in west Cumbria (he's probably not even aware of where it is ... a reminder: heard of Sellafield nee: Windscale?). Up here, it rural, it's Lake District Nationa parks area, even the main roads are twisty and undulating, edged by 'dykes' (high, walled, and grassed banks) these are not allowed to be 'interfered with' as they are part of the natural beauty of the area - hence footpaths/pavements/sidewalks are frequently non-existant.Even cycling is carried out with extreme caution as the roads are often (just) two lane wide. Travel to the remainder of the UK is carried out only after completing 'an hour and a half's travel ..before the 'journey' begins ..the M6 is is THAT far away from us, here in beautiful West Cumbria. More foten than not, to socialise it is required that we have to traverse up to 1 mile of unsurfaced track to arrive at friends homes (farms etc) ..we NEED OUR 'BIG' 4x4's. My younger daughter is at University in Leeds - some 3 1/4hrs away .... rather than rent a van to transport her belongings to and from Uni at end of semesters, we utilise the space with the (ONLY) family vehicle instead of having an inefficent, fuel-consuming van. Common sense eh? Maybe THAT item is mising among those who wish our 'big' vehicles removed from the public roads! Our 'big' 4x4's have to cope with RURAL conditions .... last winter, one night's snowfall virtually closed Western Cumbria ..a snow plough was even stuck for two days! Try travelling in your parochial 'family-taxi' in THOSE conditions!
This country is rapidly becoming a place that's not pleasant to live, due to the mistrust of everyone, by those in 'power' ... have you been abroad? Unless I'm beginning to loose my sight, I'm sure 'we' (in the UK) are the most filmed/video'd/CCTV'd in Europe. It's disgraceful, I've nothing to hide and yet, have my personal 'space' and freedom observed and recorded by faceless operators. Research carried out (and published) suggests that the proliferation of speed monitoring cameras actually increases motoring accidents - due to the driver having to concentrate on his speedometer instead of watching the road ahead. When those fuel protests happened some years ago, Mr 'Deputy Prime Minister' broght in (overnight) another new Law: to make it illegal for a member of the public to even approach a refinery access road ......... 'freedom'? a 'democracy'? ...er...I think NOT!
David H

Posted by David Culley, 28th February 2007 3:32pm

The poor British Public are taxed to death by the mishandling of public purse by incapable politicians of this country. When you can use the NY subway for a flat rate of $2.00 why does it cost £6.00 for the same on the Tube? Simply we have got a workshy public demanding, highest wage and despite all the tax that pours into teh coffers, if it's not for Transport and defence just what is it squandered on??? It's time UK Plc gets some hard lessons from the Chinese and Indians as to how to use their valuable resources sensibly. Does it not worry anyone in this country that we depend on Service Sector to bring in revenue whereas manufacturing and innovation slowly dies a death?

In effect every 100 earned by the higher tax payer, actually £20 goes into his pocket.. just why work? Sit at home and watch SKY all day and teh State will come and suck up to you! Great philosophy preached by the Governments of this Country. 'Awake, arise and stop not until you reach your goal': the goal must be chaps to make our Governments accountable. The current system just fails eveyone. Let's have a rethink

Posted by Naj Baskaran, 28th February 2007 3:32pm

How will this affect my job as a district nurse? We are given 33p per each mile that we cover, and given a 'user allowance' each month of £52.17 which hasnt altered for years. These amounts no where near cover what we have to pay out in road tax, fuel, insurance, wear and tear etc...
Im sure others will have the same problem.

Posted by Kathryn Clinton, 28th February 2007 3:33pm

I hate it like i hate all other taxes.

I do not drive so I have to take public transport, and everyday I am late to work, this tax is just another way of squeezing money out of the britsh public, no other contry has as many taxes as us.

The problem with public transport is ITS NEVER ON TIME, DUE TO WHICH PROB ABOUT 60% OF BRITAIN IS LATE TO WORK, SCHOOL, COLLEGE, UNIVERSITY + IT COST TOO MUCH ALREADY, I HAVE TO PAY £4 TO GET TO AND FROM WORK WHILST IF I HAD A CAR & LICENSE IT WOULD COST £2.50. What were not told is what is going to happen to the extra tax we pay, are you going to build more bus stops, are you going to buy more buses, are you going to fix broken bus stops, are the amount of bus interval times going to be reduced? What exactly is going to happen.

Posted by Uma, 28th February 2007 3:33pm

There is a really simple soloution and everybody knows it...

just put a few extra pence on fuel tax.

I know it is high enough, but it would tax us fairly for how much fuel we use. Cars with big engines would be taxed more than say an old person that just does daily trips to the local shops. We just need a sensible rebate scheme and this will all be sorted out quite simply.

Why make it so complicated?!

Ian

Posted by Ian Mitchell, 28th February 2007 3:34pm

The tracking of vehicles is another way of this Government controlling the population. What ever they say about it not having anything to do with Big Brother we cannot trust the Government to keep their word. You will not convince me, on their past record, that the proposed method of taxation would not increase tax on all of us and not to the benefit of the travelling public.
I have a 4 x 4, which runs on LPG, but it is needed for my work. In the winter it is used, as are many in the Countryside, to help people stranded in bad weather. The public transport system in the rural areas of Britain do not provide for the needs of the public. Buses are infrequent or non existant and the trains are unreliable and are the most expensive in Europe. Until the Government gets a grip of the public transport system the car is the main form of transportation for our population. Those that do not live in towns and cities cannot get on their bikes. We do not all live in London.

Posted by Bob French, 28th February 2007 3:34pm

It's always infuriating for the majority of the population to hear someone within easy reach of a viable public transport system (ie Londoners) to insinuate that people are lazy not to do likewise.
The truth is the public transport system nationwide is expensive and unuseable for most commuting.
I travel a lot both professionally and socially and like most would love to leave the car at home, but there is simply no affordable alternative.
It's not like I live in the middle of nowhere either.
On the continent passenger trains run frequently, affordably and most areas have good access, but for the average working Brit they are the luxury, not the motor car.
Typically the politicians do not realise this, aided and abetted by the ignorant but fortunate few.

Posted by L Dolan, 28th February 2007 3:34pm

As usual the normal brigade of non-car owners voice their opinion about a subject they have no knowledge and which does not effect them.
The public transport system in this country has been getting worse since the railway network was broken up in the sixties. Privatisation linked with Thatchers 'greed for all' policies have ensured that you cannot travel anywhere at a reasonable cost or time. I work for myself and it would be impossible to visit my clients by public transport even if I could afford it.
I assume some of the inane comments made on this blog are from people who do not work or travel. In my experience everbody needs to travel at some time so I do hope they are happy to pay the excessive cost without complaint.
For far too long politicians have seen the motorist as a soft touch and will continue to do so until we make a stand. If one reads the reply to those who signed the petition from 'Tony' it still by-passes the fact that politicians are supposed to have addressed just these such issues, but over the years have neglected to do so.
One can only hope that those mis-guided individuals who think road pricing is good eventually see that in the end the consumer pays!

Posted by Bruce Reay, 28th February 2007 3:35pm

I own a 2.5 petrol Nissan X trail i have just done 13.180 miles in three years motoring.I am 70 in july ,provide a home for two disabled people,suffer myself with Arthritus and need the x trail for its easy accesibilityjust m.o.td and the emissions are passed as below the 125%level,i have been taxed on the same rate as a range rover 4litre sport £190.00!
i think the only fair tax method is on fuel as ALL will HAVE to pay their share,this is the only way to pay for what you use personally and for all to pay their share.
best wishes,
Keith Ridgway SHEFFIELD.

Posted by Keith Ridgway, 28th February 2007 3:36pm

This comment has been removed as it was found to be in breach of our Blog Policies.

ANY GOVERNMENT ,WHOEVER WAS IN AT THE MOMENT WOULD PICK ON THE DEAR OLD MOTORIST FOR A FEW MORE QUID,RIGHT I AGREE ROADS AND SUCH HAVE GOT TO BE PAID FOR,FAIR DO'S,BUT THE MOTORIST WILL PICK UP THE TABS FOR GOVERNMENT MISTAKES....PENSIONS....PLUS THEY'VE GOT TO PAY FOR THE 2012 OLYMPICS SOME HOW,WHICH IS ESCALATING OUT OF PROPORTION...THEY'VE BEEN DOING IT FOR DONKEY'S YEARS,NO GOVERNMENT WHICH EVER IS IN AT THE TIME WILL NEVER CHANGE

Posted by David Collins, 28th February 2007 3:36pm

I believe that before there is any discussion about road pricing as a solution to congestion, there must be in place a viable alternative to car use and this simply does not exist. The priority for the government should be putting all its energy and spending into providing a first class, national, public transport system. I know many people who would willingly leave their car keys at home, if there was a reliable choice.

Posted by Marion Jenkins, 28th February 2007 3:36pm

As with most things that are taxed any excuse is brought in to increase the tax until it is so high that rebellion is in the wind,then that concept disappears and another is born that gets a little approval ,with transport it appears to be congestion and or global warming, The fact is transport charges in what ever form are far to high. if goverments had planned for the future instead of live now we would not be in this mess with transport

Posted by Tony Wascoe, 28th February 2007 3:37pm

What about the people who dont ever pay car tax, mot or insurance. How are these going to pay. I surely dont see them queuing up to pay for a box to put in their car, nor do I see them paying any fine for going over the speed limit. So will we be overcharged (as usual) to compensate these - I think so.

Posted by Nicola Griffiths, 28th February 2007 3:38pm

Regardless of whether this is a good idea or not (and it is not!), the Government has proved many times that it is not capable of providing a computer system of the required magnitude. So it should spend the money on improving public transport instead.

Posted by John Edward Goddard, 28th February 2007 3:38pm

I am unsure why some folk are geting at 4WDs. They consume the same amount if not less than many people carriers, which normally carry the same or less passengerds. IF you look most vehicles of 2000 cc you will find that they also consume the same amount of fuel. 4WDs are fine, I live in the country and use a 4WD to carry timber, livestock and farm supplies am I supposed to put this in a Smart Car?

It would also be good to know when there will be a reasonable transport system in rural areas. Tax paid by rural dwellers is not fairly distributed into a decent transport system rural or national would be good.

Any new taxes will be just that extra tax on people already paying too much. The road fund tax is supposed to go into erm ROADS and yet that clearly is not the case. As for police cash machines, sorry road cameras wasnt revenue supposed to go into local road safety. In fact a significant sum gets spent on lots of other areas ( tax ?)

A fraction of the cost being spent on this type of scheme could be given to China etc so that their manufacturing plants reduce emissions. In reality this would be cheaper and reduce global warming by a far geater figure.

Posted by Richard, 28th February 2007 3:38pm

i dont use public transport as a bus or a train will not carry the goods i need and to where i want to go.


people are telling me its bad useing my car but you take 1 double decker bus run it all day and it puts out more c02 emissions than my car does in two weeks so if sum1 can tell me what is more helather

Posted by Stewart Macbride, 28th February 2007 3:38pm

If it makes the roads quieter this would make driving much more enjoyable, less stressful, less dangerous and reduce emissions. I use public transport and cycle a lot which has meant some sacrifices but I save loads of money get to read the paper or a book and keep fit. I'm sure more companies would introduce flexible working hours and working from home which would benefit everyone not just reduce congestion.

Posted by Daniel Parris, 28th February 2007 3:40pm

We have to reduce traffic. We have to reduce the impact of traffic emissions on the environment generally. For the health of us all we need to make the air safe to breathe and our transport routes safe for cyclists and pedestrians. The fuel tax escalator should be reinvigorated.

It would also be good to get all untaxed and unisured vehicles off the roads.

Finally, let's re-nationalise the buses and put some serious investment into providing a real alternative to the priovate car.

Posted by Maxine Mathews, 28th February 2007 3:40pm

I would like to be able to get public transport to/from work but due to the location it is impossible. I also have to take work wherever it is available and that could be anywhere. The system being proposed would not stop me from travelling in my car because I have no choice. Most people in the automotive industry have to move location and travel over 50 miles each day only to get to work.

Posted by Maria Evans, 28th February 2007 3:40pm

hi all

ow about a parking tax for people using their cars to take the children to school. this would do far more for congestion than waht is beimg proposed.

i do not see why i should pay more i have a duel fuelled car and a smart car its not about congestion its the new labours way of putting on hidden tax since they have been in our tax is now about 44% this is rediculas

phill

Posted by Phill Jones, 28th February 2007 3:40pm

This comment has been removed as it was found to be in breach of our Blog Policies.

I certainly did sign the petition.

Why not add all travel costs, including road tax and basic third party insurance to the price of fuel.

1/ Everyone driving will be taxed and insured!

2/ Pay per mile will also be paid.

3/ The more you drive, the more you pay on all road charges.

4/ Smaller engines, smaller bills.

Also to include so called Green vehicles, perhaps a fee to re-charge electric vehicles

#1/ will lessen illegal drivers!

Posted by Chris Geri, 28th February 2007 3:40pm

I fully agree with David Hutchings comments (75) regarding the issue of Road/Fuel Taxes. If ALL the revenue from these punative taxes had been spent on the roads in the UK we would have a Road System second to none in the World. German roads are excellent with minimum road works, maximum speed limits in excess of UK's and less accidents -Why ? Perhaps the German drivers are not continually looking for Speed Cameras and are concentrating on theur driving instead !

Posted by Derek Wilson, 28th February 2007 3:40pm

Happily I would get a bus to work and on social occasions but where I live in Milton Keynes, the public transport is horrendous, the last bus home for me is 6.00pm. I have to ferry the children around as there is no other way for them to see friends, as they are so spread around. We dont work near our homes so have to have 2 cars.........we dont want to, but have no choice. If the government and local councils sort out this problem then we would all be better off, I wouldn't have to support two cars for one thing, & my contribution to greenhouse gases would be halved.

Posted by Sharon Kinge, 28th February 2007 3:40pm

I need my car to get to work and home due to the unsociable shifts I have to work as a nurse with the NHS. The place where I work is in a poor area and I for one don't fancy a 30 mins walk to the Metro followed by the journery to Bury to hopefully connect with the bus to get home about 11pm to start out again in the morning at about 6.30 am to start the early shift. So whatever happens I will end up paying more one way or another.

Posted by Rosemarywilson, 28th February 2007 3:41pm

It is all well the Government bleeting on about using public transport when it getting so expencive to use.
Trying to get in this road pricing through the back door and tring to make so you don't use your car or too expensive.
Next thing we can't aford to buy cars then the car workers will be up in arms because thier jobs are going

Posted by Kevin Dent, 28th February 2007 3:41pm

I agree with most of the comments I have just read and would like to add these to the show: This Government is both morally and financially bankrupt, it is in a position of "no confidence" from the people of this country. When you have politicians that do not listen to the electorate you end up with a dictatorship and not democracy! We do not appear to have any real politcians left because they only listen to non elected "spin doctors". When we can get back on track with proper local and national elected politicians we may have a proper demoracy!

Posted by Art Westbrook, 28th February 2007 3:41pm

I only have one thing to say, that is if this govenment did away with road tax and petrol duty I would agree with them. If not then I am 100% against road pricing.

Posted by Robert Farmer, 28th February 2007 3:42pm

This comment has been removed as it was found to be in breach of our Blog Policies.

I signed the petition while agreeing with the concept simply because hard experience tells me that any new tax will not be offset by reductions in petrol tax or road fund tax. This would just become an additional cost to motorists.
I believe that the problem is as much a matter of planning as anything else. We build new houses out in the sticks and then have virtually no public transport to allow the residents to travel to work without a car. How often do you hear of a new housing development resulting in a new train station? Similarly we build industrial estates and retail parks which are only reachable by car and attract customers away from the shops which they could reach by public transport.

Posted by Thomas Gilmore, 28th February 2007 3:43pm

I used to commute to work enduring a 20 hour commute just to get from A to B, in snow wind rain delys, cancellations, and standing up having paid £400 a month for the pleasure of it. The Car for me is the safest most secure way of ensuring I get around, I used to be a real believer in Public transprt but since privatisation the routes are getting less and less in the future we will only have routes from London to Glasgow and thats it,

The latest tragedy to hit the news in recent days is another nail in the coffin of confidence for those poor sods that have to get on a train every day who have no other option, here's a suggestion instead of pumping Billions into a rail system that the public no longer owns, lets divert some of this cash so sort out this mess

Offer Tax incentives to employers who allow workers who can, work from home, the £400 a month I paid for the trian was the same as my morgage,

Unless we as a society become more flexable people will always clog the roads at peak times, as that is when people go to and finish work, pick up kids etc, and its those people that will alway get stung with stealth taxation as its a no win situation for the commuter.

I saw the news the other day and within 30 minutes I heard about a possible 5 different taxes and charges being introduced within the UK,

I have no problems paying Taxes, but since labour came to power over 17 new taxes have been introduced through the backdoor and I do not see any benefit to me or my community,

The pay per mile is for me and my family edging us ever more to the real possibility of moving abroad,

Posted by Mark Miles, 28th February 2007 3:43pm

This comment has been removed as it was found to be in breach of our Blog Policies.

Why do we all put up with this? the fact is complaining about it is not very productive, nor was the partition.. It would be great if the millions came together and did something to make the goverment accountable. We the people need a way to vote on items and the government should have to make it happen, not just do what it thinks.

Posted by Geoff Hoyle, 28th February 2007 3:44pm

Once again we have major policy driven by people living in Islington and Notting Hill with frequent tubes and buses on their doorstep. It is very easy to take the high ground in those circumstances. If you happen to live in the rural areas, and surprise surprise, many people do then public transport is as frequent as the Great Condor.

Until we have a train and bus system that is cheap, affordable and available when needed then cars are not a luxury they are essential. Why we have the most expensive public transport system in Europe escapes me.

Posted by Neil Duncan, 28th February 2007 3:44pm

To those of you who are keen to get people out of their cars and onto public transport could I point out that not all of us live in large towns and cities where public transport is regular and reliable. I live 6 miles in 3 directions from any moderately sized town and 15 from a large town with more shops/facilities. There ARE no local shops to speak of (the post office sells a few staples but keeps limited hours). There is 1 bus per hour in one direction and 1 every 2 hours in the other. I drive (not a 4x4) but how do people who can't/don't get their shopping, etc. My son goes to a FE college but there's no bus there (or no feasible route without it taking hours, one of his friends takes 2 hours to do a 25 minute car journey). Yes, we should use our cars less but what is the alternative when we are so poorly served by public transport

Posted by Maggie Lewis, 28th February 2007 3:45pm

The petition was totally daft - anyone would want to say I don't want to pay anything more, the fact is that our roads are ridiculously full and vehicle ownership rises year by year - we will be in gridlock at peak times in many parts of the cpountry in 10 years time to say nothing of the environmental damage we are causing. We are on a fools trip if we think we can continue to have individual travel capsules wherever and whenever we want then and to hell with the consequences.

We do have to put major public resources into public transport so however anyone wants it more money will be necessary

Posted by Dag Saunders, 28th February 2007 3:46pm

David L and Una obviously have no concept in living outside a major city where transport is restricted. Una's comment of 'most people who sign this will have 3 cars 5 of which are 4X4's also possibly tells us something about her brain power!!!!!!!!
The Govt use environmental issues as an excuse for not doing anything. The train service is expensive, the roads are jammed and buses are a joke. If they want to reduce polution build more roads so millions of cars will not be stuck in jams churning out fumes.
Dave D

Posted by Dave Drinnan, 28th February 2007 3:46pm

It doesnt matter what we do to reduce our carbon emitions. As long as countries like China, India and USA are polutting on the scale that they do. They out do all our good work on cutting emissions and being greener. We are the only country in Europe that obey the rules laid down, no-one else seems to bother and dont get fined for not bothereing, the same with any law's passed by Brussels, fishing and farm policies, we are the only ones confoming, and everyone else is raping the land and sea, and polutting the atmosphere.

Posted by William Hill, 28th February 2007 3:46pm

I am a HGV driver and this would probably be the death of the UK haulage industry as we no it. As a night trunk driver i drive about 450-500 miles a night so you could understand at a proposed £1+ a mile how much extra it would cost to run these vehicles.Prices would have to be offset to the consumer so think how much groceries etc would rise. It wouldnt mean less wagons on the road as everything at some point is delivered by truck, it would be just cheaper to get foreign hauliers to come across the water and do the job cheaper as they wouldnt be bound by this ridiculous tax. Anyone who thinks trucks on the road are a pain in the backside at the moment wants to imagine what it will be like when 9 out of 10 will be from Portugal,Rumania,Turkey etc.

Posted by Mark D, 28th February 2007 3:46pm

this TAX is to stop us the general public using the roads, we pay enough taxes to repair all the knackered roads. Not all public transport is available at the time a lot of people start or finish work, how do shift workers get to and from work at all hours of the day and night. I understand that we are running out of space for new roads and housing but if public transport was cheaper, more regular, reliable, and safe more people may well use it , but sadly convenience is the name of the game and with what money is left after all the taxes we pay, buses and trains are just too dear to be used.
We the public will always be screwed by whoever is in parliament, as we are an easy target and do not cause too much hassle. Let us all tell the government of the day ENOUGH IS ENOUGH we want to have the freedom of choice, to drive or not to drive that is the question.

Posted by Graeme Messenger, 28th February 2007 3:46pm

I am one of the majority of road users that has a car through choice, not through need.

I did not sign the petition, because I was invited to do so by a scare-mongering chain email which disingeunously misrepresented the situation.

A shame as there are many good reasons against road pricing, the most significant being the big brother issue. It's not that the government want to monior our movements. It's that they don't seem to take that problem seriously enough to put in sufficient safeguards to stop it happening in the future.

At present with fuel duty we are charged by our impact on the environment. It's simple and it works- if you have an unnecesarily big and inefficient car you pay more. But there is no let up for essential users which there could be under road pricing.

Posted by Simon Jerram, 28th February 2007 3:48pm

If they want to tax the heavier road users, why dont they abolish the road tax as it stands and add it onto fuel so that high volume users pay more than the ones that only use it a short amount.

This would mean that a person that drives 20,000 miles a year will pay more for the privallage than someone who only drives 4,000 miles

It would also mean that anyone over here for a driving holiday would also be paying to use the roads making it fairer for all road users

Posted by Chris Newton, 28th February 2007 3:48pm

If road pricing was to come into force, road tax abolished and fuel tax cut, how long do you think it would be before these taxes were re-instated? It's not a question of if, but when.

Also, what would the knock-on effects be regarding the food prices at your supermarkets because of the additional costs of transport?

I suspect that the majority of those that agree with the proposal are not drivers and think that they will not be directly affected. Think again.

Posted by A Hopcroft, 28th February 2007 3:48pm

Just who are they trying to kid? They tell us that they will remove road tax etc; What would be the point of simply exchanging one tax for another unless they were going to increase it? A stealth tax that a blind man could see. Let us sort it out properly at the ballot box. The remedy is in our hands.

Posted by Jim Campbell, 28th February 2007 3:49pm

i wouldn't have a problem with the new road tax if they scrapped the tax on fuel ,or the tax disc that we now have.i think.. its disgusting that the motorist gets slammed every time,if this comes into force i will have to give up my job as my wages certanly won't go up to pay the extra charge. and it won't be worth my while going to work
having said all that if the local governments were to spend the extra money on the road network ( hahahahaahah just kidding )as if . ie busses ,trains,cycle paths , local transport running on time and improving the services ,it may take some traffic off our roads.the money the motorist pays out just seems to go into a black hole,it,s definatly not spent on improving the roads.and i do understand that we all need to be greener to save the planet for our children. but i think two jags prescot could make a bit more of an effort instead of running his wife a few hundred yards to the hairdresser.
oh and how about some kids walking to school.shock horror (kids walk)
well here i go moan moan moan.

Posted by Heather Pesticcio, 28th February 2007 3:50pm

I have to travel about 35K per year in my job. Is it any wonder that the roads are busier than ever, just count the number of Eastern European cars on our roads from workers let freely into Britain whilst only Sweden and Ireland have also done this within the EU and they still have plenty of space on their roads!!

Not to mention the huge number of busses also from Eastern Europe bringing these workers to and from Britain and adding to our motorway congestion. Its a goverment that has created this problem in the first place with an out of control population and immigration policy.

Posted by Andrew Dixon-lewis, 28th February 2007 3:50pm

we already have road tax and petrol tax, WE DONT NEED ANOTHER TAX, I suggest the government put the tax up on petrol, that way people still pay. But those with more economical cars will pay proportionally less.

Posted by Peter Sutton, 28th February 2007 3:50pm

This comment has been removed as it was found to be in breach of our Blog Policies.

I beleive the road pricing tax system is just another way for the government 'big brother' to track your every movement. Even if you take public transport, your journey to and from where ever is tracked by the 'oyster card', even thou at the moment you can still purchase a weeks bus pass on the old card style, before long that will be phased out, just like the monthly pass! What kind of privacy will people have in the future - none! But then again this whole system of things to come has already been predicted, and for those who are aware this, what is happening now should come as no surprise!...................

Posted by Andrea Lynch, 28th February 2007 3:51pm

at last, Mark D, no 347, someone else who realises what a big mistake to the haulage industry the extra tax would be, lets start putting pallets on buses, and see how long it takes to cause disruption.

Posted by Steve Smith, 28th February 2007 3:51pm

This comment has been removed as it was found to be in breach of our Blog Policies.

Regrettably I did not sign the petition. Thsi was due to pressing matters os a family nature. I agree that the imposition of a road tax is unacceptable and would not in mu opinion address the problem of road congestion.

Posted by Cyril Donald Hindley, 28th February 2007 3:51pm

If average UK milage of 10K per year, with 50% of that in rush hour, costs the same as my current tax disc, I'm happy.

But it appears that's not the case, from what I've heard - i.e. far more expensive.

At present I do 4000 miles per year and pay £195 for my tax disk. Last year I was doing 40000 miles per year and paid £135 for my tax disk (change of car). Go figure! Pay per mile ok in theory if cost are fair to everyone, and preferably capped somewhere.

No sneaky putting it up hugely every year as stealth tax though, and no sending us speeding tickets for doing 5mph over the speed limit once a year accidentally on a disused motorway! Some guarantee of big brother not watching, and guarantee of price increase policy, would be necessary to bring me on board with the idea, as well.

Just a thought.

Posted by David N, 28th February 2007 3:52pm

If ever a tax as you drive comes in it will start low with the sweetener of lower fuel & road tax, "Helping the environment", "better public transport". Give them a few years then it will doubled & trebled like every other way of robbing the motorist.
Plus include automatic speeding & parking fines with your monthly bill, they will know where you parked & how fast you travelled.
BIG BROTHER WILL BE WATCHING....YOU!!
Public transport in UK is a private business to make money for share holders not for the benifit of the public, why should taxpayers subsidise private companies??

Posted by Alan Findlay, 28th February 2007 3:52pm
Please ensure your comments comply with our Blog Policies or your comment may be removed.
Full Name: *
Email Address: *
Comments: *
Enter the code you see to the left into the text box below.
 

Your email address is required so we can verify that the comment is genuine. It will not be posted anywhere on the site, will be stored confidentially by us and never given out to any third party.

Please note that any viewpoints published here as comments are user's views and not the views of PetrolPrices.com (Fubra Ltd)

« Go Back to Main Blog