Just when you thought ‘future-proof’ motoring meant going hybrid or all-electric, rumours have been leaked regarding the Governments ‘Road to Zero’ strategy, which is looking at banning the sales of certain new hybrids from 2040, along with diesel and unleaded.

Currently, there is no defined list or parameter regarding the ban, although it’s thought that Road to Zero will target plug-in hybrids that offer less than 50 miles of travel on electric power only, which would mean most of them on sale today.

In fact, it’s been estimated that 99% of the hybrid cars sold today would not be allowed under the proposed legislation.

Knee-jerk reaction

A recent study has described the UK’s air quality as a ‘national health emergency’, so it’s entirely possible that the ‘leaked’ proposals are to combat that. However, a statement from the Department of Transport states “it is categorically untrue that the Government is planning to ban the sale of hybrid (and plug-in hybrid) cars in the UK by 2040. The Road to Zero strategy is yet to be finalised and has not been agreed by ministers”.

As to the reality of the situation, it’s entirely possible that the Government could take this action, but is this more a question of being seen to do something, rather than looking to introduce heavy-hitting measures against cars?

Hybrid-powered cars have been around for decades, the first true hybrid dates back as far as the 1900’s (Lohner-Porsche Elektromobil), but in more recent times, the car that started it all was the Toyota Prius, introduced back in 1997.

The purpose of hybrid

Putting aside performance cars, a hybrid vehicle has been designed for one purpose only, and that is to offer something ‘greener’ for the average motorist. If you wanted economy, there are dozens of cars that will outperform a hybrid in terms of pure MPG, and some cynics may say that manufacturers are jumping on the bandwagon in response to the CAFE legislation (Corporate Average Fuel Economy).

Hybrids have been designed to travel only short distances on electric power but making a vehicle travel further than 50 miles on battery power alone is easy, just ask Elon Musk. The technology is available, manufacturers are already looking to extend the ranges of most of their hybrids anyway, so is this shocking headline anything more than the British Government beating their chest and proving their green commitment to the world?

Mike Hawes, Chief Executive of the SMMT says “unrealistic targets and misleading messaging on bans will only undermine our efforts to realise this future, confusing consumers and wreaking havoc on the new car market and the thousands of jobs it supports”. Surely the number of industry experts who are warning the government on this matter should be raising flags to the Environment Secretary? At this time of change, the car industry needs stability as the transition to an electric world starts.

Long-term effect

Technology changes day-to-day, the legislation does have to keep pace to a degree, but announcements such as this “Hybrids will be banned!” effectively means nothing today. We have another two-decades before we face the ban, isn’t it likely that as a natural progression, hybrids will be able to travel further than 50-miles?

The bigger question should be regarding infrastructure, and how that will affect us. It’s clear that fossil fuels are on the way out, motorists are slowly coming to terms with electrification – just 5.2% of all new vehicle sales this year have been electric, although that number is steadily rising, but while we will be encouraged to go green, just what are the logistics?

Over two-thirds of households in London have no access to off-street parking, being able to access a charging spot could be more difficult than parking outside your own home, and while there are new technologies in development, who foots the bill?

Charging an electric car in public costs around £10 for an 80% charge on average, including subscription costs, connection fees and monthly recurring fees. It is a necessity for an electric vehicle to have an overnight plugin spot as using the public speed charging points can be harmful for the battery with long-term use.

How will this affect you?

Until an official announcement has been made, there is very little that we can do with the information. Whether the Government do/do not ban certain hybrids in 2040, it’s unlikely that any car purchase decision made today will impact any driver in 22 years time.

With that said, gaining a better understanding of where the legislation is heading could sway your purchasing choices later on, keeping abreast of the situation is as much as you can do right now, and we’ll be updating this article when more information is released, so keep checking back.

The pace at which technology moves and changes means that banning hybrids that can’t reach 50-miles is a complete non-event, but given that Government can introduce legislation at any point, maybe we’ll see that target change.

It seems that while stating that banning the sale of new combustion engine cars by 2040 was a very strong message that provided the Government with real environmental credentials, if this change is also announced as official policy it feel like it may hinder efforts rather than improve the situation.

Do you think announcing a ban on the sale of new hybrid engine cars now 22 years beforehand is worth doing? Would it even influence buying a hybrid car now? Let us know in the comments.

Roadworks are one of those things that we all grudgingly accept on our roads. But a new report shows that more than nine in ten of these roadworks are delayed and a chief cause of the delays is blundering local councils.

Misfiring roadwork plans

Official figures have been published that show the extent of disruption around the UK caused by roadworks that take longer than they are planned. Drivers across England and Wales suffer from the equivalent of 128 years (or 47,000 days) of overrun roadworks every month.

And at the heart of the problem is councils and utility firms who start work but then don’t finish it on time for various reasons. In some cases, the projects are planned for days and end up running for weeks, causing massive disruption to drivers.

The government has already had a crackdown on utility companies to ensure that they are more organised and punctual with their roadwork plans. But the report shows that it is local councils that are behind many of the problems leading AA president, Edmund King, to accuse them of ‘taking their eye off the ball.’

Shocking figures

The England and Wales Performance Scorecard, compiled by the Highway Authorities and Utilities Committee, looked at a range of details about roadworks. Some of the most shocking figures to come from it included that road repairs carried out by local councils or their contractors were three times more likely to overrun. This is compared to work done by energy, water or telecoms companies.

Another problem is that workmen working for the local councils are often less likely to repair the road surface after the work is done to the required specifications. On roads already suffering from huge pothole problems, this simply adds more frustration for drivers.

An example being the roadworks carried out between April to July 2017. These lasted for 4.2 million days or 68% of the total roadworks carried out. But they were responsible for 132,000 overrun days or 94% of the total delays.

Compared with this was utility forms who carried out 1,965,000 days of roadworks which were equivalent to 32% of the roadworks. And they were responsible for just 9,000 overrun days.

Work carried out

Local councils tend to carry out a variety of work on the road including resurface and filling in potholes. They also are responsible for changing road layouts and adding ‘traffic calming’ measures such as speed bumps. These projects can be more prone to delays than other types of projects which can cover some of the overrun days.

Utility companies are more likely to dig up roads to repair infrastructures such as water mains or gas pipes. Or they may open roads to lay new pipes or to upgrade broadband infrastructure.

Examples of the problem

There are plenty of examples of the problems caused by overrun roadworks and the chaos they can cause. The A3 near Guildford saw one lane closed at the beginning of May when roadworks overrun, and a contractor vehicle then broke down. The problem led to drivers having a delay of 55 minutes on their morning journey as an exit slip road was also closed for roadworks.

Another example of chaos came from the M4 in mid-April. The motorway was closed westbound after roadworks took longer than expected. When they were due to open at 6am, a resurfacing lorry then broke down, causing major delays. To make things worse, mild temperatures meant the road surface wasn’t ready for use. To add to the misery, an accident with a car and lorry then made the situation even worse for drivers.

Adding to the problem

The problem of overrunning roadworks has a knock-on effect towards dealing with another huge problem drivers are facing around the UK – the problem of potholes. The harsh winter, including the infamous ‘Beast from the East’ weather front, has caused the problem to worsen dramatically and local councils are already struggling to deal with it.

According to the RAC, the period from January to March this year saw a 2.3% increase in the number of call-outs associated with pothole damage including broken suspension springs, damaged shock absorbers and distorted wheels. This is double the rate for the previous three months and equated to over 5,500 cases.

The problem led to the government allocating an extra £100 million for councils at the end of March. But if the local councils are having so many problems with projects overrunning, the question has to be – can they get around to fixing the potholes, even with the extra money?

Necessary evil

There’s no doubt that roadworks are a necessary evil that is crucial in keeping the road network operating. But as the AA’s Mr King pointed out, delayed roadworks waste time, money and test the patience of drivers. And while utility companies have traditionally been blamed for the problem, these new figures show that a greater problem lies with the local councils.

A Local Government Association spokesman said that councils tend to do ‘longer-term roadworks’ that are more likely to overrun and claim that comparing data with private companies is misleading.

Have you ever suffered due to overrunning roadworks? Was it due to a utility company or a local council project? Let us know in the comments below

Pedestrians who are elderly or young, visually impaired, deaf or use headphones while walking are at risk of being hit by electric and hybrid cars due to how quiet they are at low speeds. This is resulting in calls for them to be issued with noise generating technology that will alert pedestrians who may not otherwise notice them coming.

Although the EU is introducing rules which state that these cars must be fitted with low-speed alerting sounders, will it be too little too late with the Government’s push to get more of these environmentally friendly, but silent, vehicles on the UK’s roads?

Electric vehicles are ‘Silent Killers’

The biggest call for electric and hybrid cars to be issued with technology that creates a sound comes from road safety group SteerSafe who have branded these vehicles as ‘Silent Killers’ because vulnerable people cannot hear them approaching which puts them at risk of being hit.

This includes the elderly, the blind, children, the deaf, headphone wearers, and those who are preoccupied or unwary and unable to take in what is happening around them.

SteerSafe is headed up by founder Christopher Hanson-Abbott OBE who gained his OBE for services to safety in transport when he made the first reversing alarm for large vehicles 40 years ago. He has stated that he would like ministers to set an example to the rest of Europe by being the first country within this continent to make noise emitting technology on quiet cars compulsory.

Over in the United States, they are already ensuring that all new hybrid and electric cars make noise at low speeds to help to keep pedestrians safe.

Although the EU will be making it mandatory for car manufacturers to fit these devices to new cars from 2019, with all electric and hybrid cars already on the roads being required to have a sounder retrofitted by 2021, SteerSafe feel that this is not good enough as these ‘Silent Killers’ are already causing a risk on the roads.

British engineers have been working on creating a sounder for quiet vehicles for over five years, with most designs being speakers which are fixed to the car and work in the direction that it is travelling so that the noise doesn’t annoy those who are not in the vehicle’s path.

A variety of sounds have been tested, including the whine of an old electric motor, the rumble of a petrol or diesel engine, and computerised squawks, and the sound would be emitted when the vehicle was travelling at 19mph or slower when there is little or no noise from the wheels on the road

The rise of electric cars

Due to the Government investing hundreds of millions of pounds in trying to increase the number of environmentally friendly vehicles on the UK’s roads, and offering tax breaks to those who drive one, there was a 40% rise in registrations of these cars last year and 45,400 new cars sold on the road by the end of 2017.

It is also expected that these figures will rise due to the fact that no new petrol or diesel cars will be sold after 2040. In addition to this, leaked details of the Government’s ‘Road to Zero’ policy make it sound like any vehicle that can’t travel 50 miles on electric alone will also be banned from sale, and this includes all of the hybrid and plug-in hybrid vehicles that are currently on the market.

Although many people are in favour of driving a vehicle which does not damage the environment, it is vital that the issue of how they put vulnerable people at risk is taken seriously as the amount of accidents is simply rising with the number of these cars that are being driven.

Accidents caused by quiet cars

In research carried out by the charity, Guide Dogs for the Blind in 2015 they found that people are 40% more likely to be hit by a car that makes little or no sound in comparison to a petrol or diesel model and that there was a 54% increase in incidents with quiet cars between 2012 and 2013.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration also back this up with their statistic that 2,400 pedestrians are injured every year by quiet cars, and that issuing sounders would put a stop to this high number of incidences.

Guide Dogs manager James White has pointed out that they are totally in favour of increasing the number of eco-friendly cars on the roads, but that more has to be done in order to make them safer.
Since electric cars are so quiet at low speeds, the only thing to suggest is as a pedestrian is to become hyper-aware at road junctions and crossings. Look in all directions when crossing and of course, make sure that you abide by the road traffic regulations and cross when the road signs are green in colour.

Are you concerned about the risks caused by quiet electric and hybrid vehicles? What noise do you think would be the most effective at alerting pedestrians about the vehicle’s presence? Let us know in the comments below.

Diesel fuel has been firmly in the crosshairs of the government and environmental campaigners for a number of years now, and December 2017 saw a record fall in sales for new diesel cars – down 31% from the previous December.

The reason why diesel, in particular, is being targeted is down to emissions; the combustion process produces Nitrogen Oxides (NOx), which include Nitrogen Dioxide, Nitrous Oxide and Nitric Oxide. Studies have shown that long-term exposure to some of these will significantly increase the risk of respiratory problems, and Particulate Matter (from diesel) has been shown to cause cancer.

Here in the UK, there were 11,940 premature deaths attributed to nitrogen oxide last year, and a further study put Oxford Street, London as the second highest level of nitrogen oxide pollution in Europe.

Test Bed Driving

Manufacturers have to prove their product emissions through the use of a test bed – an engine dynamometer or rolling road, which in theory, works well. Anyone in the automotive trade will tell you that these don’t simulate real-world driving conditions, and ‘driving’ a test vehicle in a cell that’s perfectly controlled (heat, humidity, load, speed, air pressure) doesn’t put the same demands on the engine or drivetrain.

This can lead to such situations that Volkswagen found themselves in back in 2015, although whether that was a deliberate abuse or genuine mistake, only Volkswagen know, but new European legislation was passed in 2017 that required new cars to be tested with RDE (Real Driving Emissions).

The Bosch Breakthrough

The regulation currently states that all new cars should emit no more than 168 milligrams of NOx per kilometre under urban, extra-urban and motorway driving, but that is set to be tightened further in 2020 – the target is 120 milligrams.

As one of the world’s best-known fuel-injection (FI) manufacturers, Bosch has developed a new FI system that could see the revival of diesel once again. In a recent statement, they say that 13 milligrams of NOx per kilometre is entirely possible, with no loss of economy and performance, and no increase in CO2 emissions.

They go on to say that even in the most extreme of conditions, they’re averaging just 40 milligrams per kilometre – still under a quarter of the current limit, regardless of weather, temperature, traffic or speed.

The system uses a combination of advanced fuel-injection technology, newly developed air management systems, and intelligent temperature management to make this possible, but Dr Volkmar Denner, Bosch CEO still believes there’s further development to be done with increasing reliability on artificial intelligence (AI).

Denner’s vision is to create an engine with virtually no impact on ambient air; no significant particulate or NOx emissions, for both unleaded and diesel engines.

Future Planning

We often see plans to reduce emissions, improve mpg, boost power, but they tend to be a statement of where a company wants to be heading rather than what they’ve been doing. In this case, the technology and components are available now, off-the-shelf, ready to be picked for a production run.

As to what this means to the sales price remains to be seen, but Bosch has said that it wouldn’t necessarily mean an increase to the price for a consumer, but as with any technology, it’s usually the end-user that pays for development.

So if you have diesel car that you know is high polluting, what can you do?

Waiting for the system to become commonplace isn’t really viable – despite what Denner says, manufacturers will have their production schedules in place for some time to come, so the reality is that we may not see the new wonder Bosch system fitted to a productionised car for at least a year, perhaps longer. Can we wait another year? Or does that mean all purchases are put on hold until it is on a production vehicle?

Nor do we know how viable it would be to retrofit this new technology, or even if it’s at all possible? There are over 12 million diesel cars registered in the UK, and while the newer diesels may be ‘clean’, it will take a number of years to replace all 12 million.

There’s very little you can do right now to change things, but you can at least ensure that your vehicle is working to the best of its abilities – making sure your particulate filter is clean is perhaps the biggest step, but the rest of it is regular, good practice; correctly inflated tyres, clean air filter, regular oil changes are just common sense and will help to keep your car running as it should.

It’s great to see that manufacturers are still pushing development of fossil-fuelled vehicles and that the death knell that appeared to be imminent might just have been postponed for now, but we’re still in the dark when it comes to plans. Of course, we could end up with further segregation for cars, but in all reality, unless the technology becomes widely adopted, and recognised by the government, this could be just a little too late.

With society knowing about the dangers of diesel, do you think that it’s possible that this could turn things around? Would you even look to swap from an unleaded vehicle to diesel if this became common practice?

In a bid to try to reduce dangerous air pollution, the Welsh Government has released plans to lower the speed limit of five different stretches of road to a maximum of 50mph, two of which are on the busy M4 motorway. This would be the first parts of any motorway in Britain with a fixed speed limit lower than 70 mph.

They hope that this move will reduce nitrogen dioxide levels on roads that currently exceed legal emissions limits and expect that lowering the speed limit will have almost immediate results on the amount of air pollution in these locations.

Clean Air Fund

The plans to reduce speed limits are part of the Welsh Government’s £20 million Clean Air Fund which seeks to lower the amount of air pollution in Wales and show the country as being a leader in innovative and effective clean air solutions.

This comes from the Welsh Environment Minister, Hannah Blythyn, who stated on the 24th April that one of her key priorities is to reduce air pollution and that she is confident that the proposals they have in place will help them to achieve this goal and create cleaner air for both local communities and the environment.

In a recent study by the World Health Organisation, Port Talbot in Wales came top as having the worst air pollution in the UK. However, air quality in Wales has improved overall compared to previous decades, and Blythyn is hopeful that by taking further action to reduce air pollution from all possible angles, the Government can lower the risks that both the public and the environment are currently facing.

The Welsh Government admitted that they failed to suggest suitable ideas for reducing air pollution in the past, and this is why it has been pushed into the spotlight now.

The fund will run until 2021 and will also help to support local authorities to comply with nitrogen dioxide limits, plus a website will be launched which allows people to look at the air quality levels in their area in real-time.

This website will also feature data on current and forecasted air pollution levels, plus historical information and related health advice too. In addition to this, schools will be able to access educational games, tools and materials which they can use to teach children about air pollution, the dangers that it can bring, and they can help to reduce it.

Clean Air Zones have also been proposed which will be areas of the road which are out of bounds for older, more polluting cars, or charges them for entering these zones. Ministers are currently looking into whether these zones should be made mandatory for local authorities or if they should be voluntary, whereas in England Birmingham, Derby, Leeds, Nottingham and Southampton authorities have all been told that the need Clean Air Zones in place by 2019.

Will reducing the speed limit work?

It is proposed that the sections of road which will have their speed limit reduced are the M4 between 41 and 42 Port Talbot, the M4 at Newport, the A494 at Deeside, the A483 at Wrexham, and the A470 between Upper Boat and Pontypridd. This change will take place in June this year.

The Welsh Government believe that by reducing the speed of traffic on these stretches of road they could cut dangerous emissions by up to 18%, but not everyone feels that this will be the case.

For example, RAC’s Head of Roads Policy, Nicholas Lyes, is sceptical about the new speed limits although he supports the Clean Air Zones which have been suggested. He believes that because these roads often experience traffic jams that lowering the speed limit to 50mph is unlikely to make a difference as although it could help with the flow of traffic, jams are still likely to occur and these are one of the causes of pollution.

This means that nitrogen dioxide levels wouldn’t necessarily fall, and Lyes suggests that the Welsh Government take a look at the capacity of these roads to get a clearer understanding of what could be done differently.

How might this affect you?

If you use one of these five stretches of road, then you are likely to see the change in speed limit to 50mph by the end of June. It may improve the flow of traffic if you are used to sitting in jams during your journey, but it will also mean that your trip will take longer to complete.

These new 50mph speed limits will be mandatory so you must stick to them like you would any other speed limit while you are travelling on one of these roads. Be aware that its likely that when these measures come in, they will be supported by a range of mobile and fixed camera placements to ensure that people are adhering to the new 50 mph speed limits.

In some cases, the cameras may be difficult to spot, as a new generation of HADECS cameras being rolled out on smart motorways are cleverly obscured in various ways to catch drivers out when they enter these new speed restricted zones.

Do you think that lowering the speed limit will have a big impact on air pollution in Wales? Do you use one of the roads that will be affected? Let us know in the comments below.

• Men named John are the most likely to cause accidents
• Ford Fiesta is the car which is involved in the most road accidents
• Law firm reported that the most common incident is being hit from the rear
• Halifax is road accident capital of the UK

New research from law firm Your Legal Friend delves into the statistics of recent road accidents within England and Wales, highlighting the most dangerous drivers on our roads.The study was based on real accident data from their system based on 25,000 claims over the last year.

The research examined factors such as the vehicles, gender and age involved in road accidents, as well as the dates and times that the most and least accidents take place. The research revealed that 93% of accidents resulted in some form of injuries, with neck injuries (74%) as the most common trauma, followed by back injuries (59%).

While there is a common misconception that age is a detrimental factor when its comes to road accidents, the study also revealed that drivers are most likely to cause an accident are at the age of 30. However, it also revealed that drivers are more likely to be on the receiving end of the accident at the age of 32, making your early thirties the most dangerous time to be out on the road.

Wrong place, wrong time

While the climate and weather does sometimes play a large role in road conditions, April was reported as the safest month on the roads with only 7.25% of all accidents, while July was the most dangerous month, with 9% of all accidents happening this month.

• Sundays are the least chaotic day of the week, with less accidents than any other day.
• Fridays are peak time for accidents, as drivers rush home after the working week.
• The most dangerous time to be on the road was 5-6pm. in the evening on any day.
• The research also revealed that the highest proportion of road accidents took place in Halifax, followed by Liverpool, Coventry, Barking and St Albans.

Which vehicle models should you look out for?

Ford cars proved to be the most accident-prone car brand with one involved in 16% of all accidents, Ford Fiesta Zetec models are the most common cars to be involved in an accident.

The 10 vehicle models most likely to cause an accident are:

1. Ford Fiesta
2. Mercedes Benz Sprinter
3. Ford – Focus
4. Ford – KA
5. Vauxhall – Corsa
6. DAF Trucks – LF
7. Volvo – FH
8. DAF Trucks – CF
9. Renault – Clio
10. DAF – XF

The 10 vehicles most likely to fall victim to an accident are:

1. Ford – Fiesta
2. Ford – Focus
3. Audi – A3
4. Mercedes Benz – Sprinter
5. Volkswagen – Golf
6. Ford – Ka
7. Renault – Clio
8. Citroën – DS3
9. Vauxhall – Corsa
10. Vauxhall – Astra

While these statistics are not proportional to the number of cars it does show that lorries (DAF) are more likely to cause accidents. While this is obvious because of their size, surely we should be concerned at the number of trucks that are on the list that are causing accidents? Is there something that can be done in the haulage community to help prevent numerous accidents?

Philip Waters, a Solicitor from Your Legal Friend commented on the findings: “At one point or another, most people have experienced that heartbreaking moment of their first road accident. This study has revealed some rather interesting statistics, challenging a few common misconceptions about drivers in society today. These facts challenge stereotypes around women drivers and the elderly on the road, showing that men in their early thirties are the most likely to cause, and be involved in, road accidents. While no two drivers are the same, it would seem over-confidence on the road can be the most harmful trait for anyone, and that all drivers should ensure that safety is their first priority while out and about.”

So, whether you’re looking to see if you’re likely to cause an accident or which drivers to avoid on the roads, check out the interactive tool here, or read through a breakdown of the statistics in this graphic.

What do you think of these statistics based on real accident data? Are you a John and drive a Fiesta in Halifax? Have you been a victim of an accident on Friday night and agree with these results? Let us know in the comments.