12.09.07 Lorry drivers to pay £200 a day to keep London clean

del.icio.us digg Technorati Furl reddit SPURL.NET
25 comments 82 votes

Ken Livingstone’s commitment to a cleaner, greener capital is well known. So it should come as no surprise that the Mayor of London has recently unveiled another potentially unpopular vehicle tax to combat pollution in the city. The London Low-Emission Zone (LEZ) will come into force on 4 February 2008, though a four-year phased introduction will mean it won’t be fully effective until January 2012. The scheme will require lorries, vans and other heavy polluters in the capital to comply with stringent emissions tests or face a penalty charge of up to £200 per day.

Anyone who has lived in London will know that there is room for improvement in air quality. As well as giving residents unpleasantly grimy skin, London’s air can endanger your respiratory and cardiovascular health. The Mayor’s Air Quality Strategy suggests that, annually, 1600 deaths have been “accelerated” (brought forward) in London as a result of air pollution. Thousands of hospital admissions and “several million minor respiratory symptoms” also result from the Big Smoke’s poor air quality. Road transport contributes more Particulate Matter and oxides of Nitrogen than any other source of pollution, and Transport for London estimates that the LEZ could prevent 40 deaths due to pollution-related illnesses each year.

By targeting older, diesel-engine vehicles, including lorries, buses, coaches, large vans and minibuses, the LEZ aims to deter individuals and companies from driving into the capital, therefore reducing levels of damaging emissions. Emissions standards will become more rigorous as the four-year introductory phase progresses. There are currently no plans to include cars, motorcycles and small vans in the scheme, but unlike the Congestion Charging Zone, the LEZ ‘’’will’’’ cover all 33 London Boroughs.

Unsurprisingly, the LEZ has not met with everyone’s approval. London First, a membership organisation representing 300 major businesses, believes that the LEZ could put small firms out of business. Modern vehicles, with lower emissions, are more expensive and fitting pollution abatement equipment may be no more affordable.

There are no plans for a grant scheme to assist businesses with the costly changes. London First also suggests that, if the LEZ is to achieve real change, it must be more inclusive, covering all vehicles and not just heavier, diesel-engine models, which tend to be used by businesses rather than private individuals. Targeting the business community, it seems, is not set to win Ken many friends.

Do you think London's pollution problems can and should be solved by reducing vehicle emissions?

Can London's pollution problems be cured by reducing vehicle emissions?
For more detail about the aims of the scheme and how it will affect you, see Transport for London’s online guide to the Low Emission Zone.

Your Comments

Click here to add your comments

WILL THIS TAX ALSO BE FOR BUS COMPANIES. HAS KEN BEEN BEHIND A BUS IT POURS OUT MUCK. HE WANTS US TO RIDE ON THEM INSTEAD OF OUR CARS, WELL AS A LADY I HAVE BEEN ON THESE DIRTY BUSES, OVERCROWDED,FILTHY SEATS, LOAD MOUTHED YOBS SHOUTING AND MAKING A NOISE. NO THANKS.

Posted by Jean Clowes, 14th September 2007 9:17pm

What is Ken Livingstone doing with all the money raised from this? Why doesn't he return it to operators of those vans, buses, lorries etc. to enable them to renew their vehicles (ie more modern, environmentally friendly etc) or convert them to other fuel types? If he is really serious about making London cleaner, he should offer them grants. Does he really think that the capital can operate without deliveries from goods vehicles or transport by coach companies? Of course not!! Government bodies want to build their own inefficient empires. In the end it will only be government-owned commercial vehicles that can operate in London. These will be purchased with taxpayers money. They never have to be commercially viable or competitive and we end up paying for their commercial inefficiency. This is the thin edge of a wedge and it has very little to do with the environment. He should offer grants to existing private enterprise to enable them to go about their business in a cleaner way - not continuously obstruct them in their work.

Posted by Karen Dean, 16th September 2007 8:52pm

I can't wait for Boris to take over from that snidey, smarmy, smug idiot Livingstone. He doesn't have a clue what it's like for commuters. I've just changed my job because the stress of travelling into London every day was just too much. People who don't live down here (as I didn't until a few years ago) have no idea just how hellish it can be! What Livingstone doesn't seem to realise is that no matter what taxes and charges he brings in, people still need to travel into London and that won't change! I haven't noticed any improvements at all since the congestion charge was brought in. There's still the same level of traffic, except now you pay £8 a day for the privilege of being stuck in it!

Posted by Mrs Havers, 17th September 2007 3:19pm

I don't live in London so this won't affect me. However, I can honestly say I hate driving behind extremely old vans!

Posted by Mathew, 19th September 2007 11:48pm

I had the leaflet through about this tax, as I understand it the tax is for all vehicles that do not meet the LEV limit so it may effect new & old vehicles. I drive a Motorhome diesel with an LPG conversion which at the MOT gives very low emissions, however I will not be exempt from this daily charge unless I get a certificate from VOSA , more expense , to exempt me which I will have to pay for a renewal every year which is another MOT.
I will no longer be visiting or spending my cash in London via the Caravan sites in London.

Posted by Michael Attew, 27th September 2007 7:38pm

I feel this rule would put many thriving but small bussinesses on the scrap heap!! The sooner Ken Livingstone is kicked out of office the better!!!

Posted by Vincent Aves, 28th September 2007 8:14am

Just another way of hitting the driver in the pocket,and i'm wondering if all the ministers,politicians are exempt from this tax like they are the congestion one,and what's ken Livingston doing with all this extra cash he's going to be racking in... Oh yes feathering his own nest cos it certainly isn't going on public transport why not just put a road block on every road to stop all traffic coming into the capital there you go job done

Posted by Kriss Smooth, 28th September 2007 9:18am

I would say most UK based transport firms are having a bad enough time without added expense, perhaps no one will be able to afford to deliver into London in the future, then jobs done. Londoners are happy with no trucks and at the weekends they can walk to the M25 and we can throw food parcels at them. Perhaps they should look at keeping services stocked and ban private traffic.

Posted by Andrew Pattern, 28th September 2007 1:33pm

I used to deliver to london on a regular basis running two vans and it is a nightmare with the congestion charge to worry about and then the traffic wardens to dodge even though there are limits for delivering they seem to make up their own rules and common sense just doesn't work there, hence the prices I now quote are loaded with the charges and potential fines so who is paying, as for me I don't care if I never deliver to london again as it's so locked up most of the time, you cannot predict when a driver may emerge after entry.

Posted by Paul Ingrey, 29th September 2007 2:04pm

I heard about this tax a few months ago, and the host on BBC London was interviewing someone from either the DVLA or a Lorry Drivers Union. To all intent and purpose, this tax is based on a databse of vehicles from the DVLA that doesn't even exist.

It seems to be purely based on year of vehicle registration.

Posted by Gareth Johnson, 1st October 2007 1:09am

ITS OK FOR MR BIG(KEN) GIVING HIS BIG IDEAS OUT, I THINK HE SHOULD HELP US OWNER DRIVERS, AND PAY FOR US TO GET OUR LORRIES CONVERTED!! ITS OK FOR HIM SITTING BEHIND HIS DESK, I KNOW LETS PICK ON THE H G V DRIVERS!!( W***ER) £200 PER DAY? THE BEST THING TO DO IS KEEP OUT OF LONDON, THEY WILL NEED YOU BEFORE YOU NEED THEM, WHAT WITH THE PRICE OF DERV AND TAX AND INSURANCE, I THINK IM GOING TO TURN POLISH, ILL GET LOADS OF HELP THEN!!!WERE BRITISH FOR FU*K SAKE, GIVE US A BREAK AND STOP KILLING US!!STAND TOGETHER WE CAN STOP THESE GOVERMENT TAKERS!! WHY DONT THEY GIVE SOME OF THERE WAGES UP?? WILL THEY? LIKE FU*K.

Posted by End Up On The Dole., 2nd November 2007 5:13pm

My business will cease to exist in July...as will most small businesses with low profit margins...I will leave my truck parked in a most inconvenient place that causes the most congestion as I hope others will do too...Lets make London cleaner for Mr Livingstone and close it for him...Gridlock London

Posted by Out Of Work By July, 3rd November 2007 3:37am

ken livivgstone is just another stuck up t--t.he wants to come and try to live in the real world instead of making other peoples lives a misery.this country has gone mad on making the enviroment cleaner. they will agree to anything and thrive on it as long it brings money into the country and the big money making word for that is taxes .greedy ba----ds.

Posted by Smudge67, 12th November 2007 10:00pm

RED KEN....! what can I say! He brought the GLC to it's knees, and now it's the turn of London. He is steadily driving Londoners and their businesses out. I employ 50 people and I've just about had enough of both Ken, Gordon Brown and labour as a whole. If he really cares, and wants to make a difference, why dosent he get his labour friends and go to Iran to fight the useless illegal war they started, leaving England for good. I for one will gladly wave them off.

Posted By Mr sickandtired.

Posted by Peter Timotheou, 24th November 2007 5:22pm

This comment has been removed as it was found to be in breach of our Blog Policies.

guys theres no use moaning about this govt are laughing at us. the french wouldn"t tolerate it so why should we.Its time to to start loading the wagons and blocking roads, ports, and petrol refineries the sooner the better ahd show we mean bussiness otherwise this lot will stop at nothing to ruin your livliehood

Posted by John Mayberry, 28th November 2007 10:49am

I hope that everybody that breaks down outside of the london boroughs realizes that if the recovery lorry that transports them home has not got the required filters then they and their vehicle will be left outside of the M25 and another company will have to collect then and continue the journey home.Tough luck if they are busy!!!

Posted by D.j.carter, 10th December 2007 8:08pm

does ken livingston not realiase how much presure he is putting on small firms having to pay to a scheem that should be illegal to begin with, after all the air is passing in and out of london faster than the trafic that use it, he does not own the right of its use and never will, that reminds me,would he publish all there own vans etc that would fail the test ,what if ken gave to a worthwhile charity the same as he wants to sting us all for,yourve probably know that he will either ghange the vans or have them made greaner by the likes of us,i say get a life ken and give london somthing worthy of a serving lord mayor , and retire grasfully, i wouldent mind none of us would if he stopped everything that does not comply the truth is it would bring london to its knees ,but that wouldent happen as the old ever so crafty one knows

Posted by Kered Koorbretsea, 4th January 2008 11:21pm

As usual, another ill-thought out policy without discussion with the groups of drivers that it affects. Last year, I sold my polluting, diesel guzzling 4x4 and horse trailer to swop for a small, 1991 horse lorry and highly efficient car in order to reduce my carbon footprint. My lorry is too old to convert to comply with the new regulations. DTL advise either purchasing a new lorry (shame my civil service pay won't stretch to £30k or so) or modifiying your existing vehicle (mine is too old to meet the standards apparently). looks like I won't be driving inside the M25 then. What happens when traffic is directed off the M25 because of accidents inside the zone? sometimes I wish that I still had the 4x4....

Posted by Julie Garvin, 7th January 2008 3:04pm

lets block london me be some will wake up
200,00 a day is a joke

Posted by Tom Walsh, 22nd January 2008 5:22pm

we are all being tax pushed and fk up all over
now if you want to drive and try to make any money
you have to spend and spend to live
wot will happen in 10 20 30 years
with these governments that screw us all the time and then say its for the good of the people
i do not see any money coming out of there pockets?//////////

thank you for the blog ken

Posted by Alan James, 19th March 2008 7:41pm

We should just boycott the whole of London , advise them to collect their material/goods from outwith the zone!

Posted by Alec Davisdon, 18th April 2008 2:18pm

why is it that there are lorries operating for the london olympics on site and off which are not LEZ compliant when bonafied operators are being charged not £200 a day but £500 a day and are unable to use thier vehicles although they are tested for emmissions every year and are issued with a pass form.

Posted by Charlotte Tugwood, 23rd April 2008 11:06pm

We all need to stick together and make all the goverment stop and think about the mess of the whole country and STOP thinking about the rest of the WORLD . If it carries on like it is every one middle class and lower will end up with ZERO,this is a extremely SERIOUS problem . One idea of mine is a complete stop for 24 hours NO work ,travelling ,electric ,gas and shopping seems extreme but this wouild be the only option i fill that would change things for the better for the normal working person .Who else fills the same ? Lets all join together and make changes PEOPLE POWER is what is needed

Posted by Julian P Hines, 30th April 2008 11:59am

Reffering to point 24 if any person wants to join our campaign please email to bbbfts@aol.com ,We all need to act URGENTLY now

Posted by Julian P Hines, 30th April 2008 1:40pm

VOTE FOR MORE RAILWAYS. Make BIG lorrries obsolete (-:

Posted by Edward Bremner, 1st November 2009 7:06pm
Please ensure your comments comply with our Blog Policies or your comment may be removed.
Full Name: *
Email Address: *
Comments: *
Enter the code you see to the left into the text box below.
 

Your email address is required so we can verify that the comment is genuine. It will not be posted anywhere on the site, will be stored confidentially by us and never given out to any third party.

Please note that any viewpoints published here as comments are user's views and not the views of PetrolPrices.com (Fubra Ltd)

« Go Back to Main Blog