14.12.07 Protesters to fire “warning shot” to the government.
Transaction 2007, the group behind the fuel protests taking place around the country tomorrow, have said that the protests are aiming to “fire a warning shot to the government.” David Handley, spokesperson for group, warned, “it's our intention to come back in January and let's put it like this, it won't be quite as peaceful as it's going to be tomorrow.”
He continued: “we have got contingency plans for where the next stage of this will go. I'm obviously not going to discuss that because the next element has got to be a surprise. That's the only way that you'll have the impact with government to make them realise that you mean business.”
Handley hopes the protests will show politicians how angry motorists are at rising fuel prices. Transaction 2007 blame the current tax system, whereby duty and VAT are added the price of petrol. He said: “we have not got an issue with tax if tax is totally transparent. It's got to be fair, it's got to be shown that the money that's drawn from the revenue from fuel, should be used to create a better infrastructure, better investment in transport and not used to prop up the inefficient management of the cash flow from government.”
The protests tomorrow will start at 10am at fuel refineries and depots across the country, including those in Manchester, Southampton, Liverpool, Essex, Cardiff, and Lincolnshire. Despite the threat of further, potentially more disruptive action early next year, Handley maintains that tomorrow's action will be peaceful. Transaction 2007 were involved in the fuel protests in 2000, where lorry drivers blockaded refineries, leading to nationwide fuel shortages. But Handley maintained: “we were accused last time by a lot of people who didn't want to take part of not doing it in the correct manner. This time we're doing it in the correct way. We're sending a message in a peaceful form, but if people don't address that and listen to us then 2000 is likely to happen all over again.”
Early indications from polls and comments on our blog have suggested that whilst motorists are angry at rising fuel prices, opinions are divided as to whether targeting refineries is the best method of protest. In addition, only 183 people have said they will be protesting tomorrow. It has been suggested that it would be better to send a petition to the government or protest in London, because they are responsible for the tax on fuel.
However, Stephen Joseph from the Campaign for Better Transport believes that reducing tax on fuel would be the worst thing the government could do. “It gives motorists the false sense of security that they can continue to drive around in their gas guzzlers. High tax acts as an incentive for motorists to switch to greener alternatives.” He continued, “fuel tax in the UK is not drastically higher than the rest of Europe. We are now only around 1% higher than countries such as Germany, France and the Netherlands.”
So are we paying too much in tax on our fuel in the UK? Should we ensure that all our tax gets spent on motoring? Or should we continue to tax at the current rate to encourage greener alternatives?








Your Comments
Click here to add your comments
If anybody believes this Government will take any notice of petitions they should try it. I have signed numerous petitions on the Number 10 website and the reply is always "No" with a subsequent load of garbage about what is best for us. The only thing that will ever influence this Socialist regime is public protest and disruption. The bunch of wimps that call themselves a Government will always back down in the face of disruption.
Are we getting over 2 US dollars to the earth UK Pound? and they still keep blaming the high dollar price for a barrel of oil??
If these clowns in government did away with the criminal fuel duty percentage fuel would still have the VAT and how much would fuel be per ltr then?
when you put £50 of fuel in your tank you don't start paying for the fuel until you get past the £42 mark!!!! who reports on that? the real cause of high fuel prices in the UK not the $ per barrel but the robbing government!
Of course we dont know whats best for us or we would not have voted in the bunch of un-reconstructed socialists in the Tory partys old clothes .
(I don't think any of the other non alternatives would be any better though)
As long as they don't start labelling people as "counter revolutionarys" we know were that leads, or is the phrase terrorist sympathisers more likely to be used so they can lock you up for six weeks without charge?